Monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a Vitamin D deficiency cancer?"

TO: All melanoma researchers, doctors, and patients.


My hypothesis--that melanoma is due to a deficiency in the "sunshine
vitamin"--is not that far-fetched.

Indeed, I have experimentally observed that newly formed moles turn
lighter with an increased intake of Vitamin D3, and they turn darker
with its elimination; moreover, adequate Vitamin D3 seems to prevent
the formation of new moles on both my little brother and myself.

Thus, since one of the hallmarks of melanoma is a darkening new or
existing mole, the cancer is plausibly due to a deficiency in the
essential Vitamin D3.

I'm really intrigued that there could be such an inexpensive
off-the-shelf solution to The Melanoma Epidemic, capable of practically
eradicating the cancer within just a few months of its widespread use.
The final proof, of course, won't come until Vitamin D3 is tested by a
number of people who are at highest risk for melanoma--hence my
repeated calls for its immediate investigation.

Thank you for carefully considering my results.

James Semmel
Albuquerque, New Mexico


reference:
http://www.mpip.org/bb/shtml/320380.shtml
3rd annual: Is melanoma simply a Vitamin D deficiency cancer?

.

Relevant Pages