Re: Support your cells by giving them what they need to live...not what they need to die

awthrawthr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Larry wrote:

awthrawthr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Larry wrote:


awthrawthr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:



That's what it all boils down to...with chemo, surgery and radiation
you're giving your cells what they need to die.

With natural methods, you're giving your cells what they need to live.

Each method has its own supporters.

It's unfortunate, but the ones who chose chemo, radiation and surgery
10 years ago don't come here any more...so decide for yourself...do you
want to give your cells what they need to live or what they need to
die?

If you submit to a needle, pill, radiation or surgery that helps your
cells die, ask yourself, "Is that what my cells need? Does this
treatment make my cells healthy or does it just kill them?"


And you think the ones that chose your way 10 years ago are still coming
here, huh? Boy are you naive. Find me one bona-fide large-scale study
... find it for one specific type of malignancy where in a large group
of people, your methods cured even 50% of the population ... or even a
large double-blind placebo study that demonstrated that your method even
lengthened the lives of 50% of the people receiving it. You must think
we're all fools.


You are asking for something that hasn't been done...the study just
hasn't been done...which is far different from saying that the results
don't exist.

However, there was a large study published in JAMA a few years back
regarding the trace mineral Selenium. The researchers found that it cut
the mortality rate in half for prostate, lung and colon cancer...and
that's just one, solitary trace mineral...a TRACE mineral. The results
were so impressive that the researchers cut part of it short and gave
all the patients selenium.

Because double blind placebo studies don't exist...because they haven't
been done... that either prove or DISPROVE your request, they best way
to analyze the question is to look at classic case studies. If you have
one or more patients whose illness is so severe that nothing can be
done - supposedly - and then they patient makes a so-called miraculous
recovery with an nutritional bombardment, then you have a "Classic Case
Study." These examples abound.

In a way, Alexander Fleming made his discovery of penicillin by
applying a classic case. He observed a mold growing in a petry dish
that had been left unattended. He also noticed that there was no
bacterial growth where the mold was. By using his powers of observation
Fleming was later able to discern that the mold had anti-bacterial
properties. (BTW, his 1928 discovery was rejected until World War II
when the necessity of anti-biotics became paramount.)

In a similar fashion, if you use your powers of observation and
something extraordinary occurs, a smart person takes note of it.

You aren't a fool unless you ignore the obvious. When a woman is green
and gray with sickness, her wispy hair looks like dead straw, her eyes
are yellow, her CA125 is 79, and she regularly piss and *** on herself
AND the doctor says that the chemo isn't working, AND she had evidence
of cancer mets THROUGHOUT their body from an ovarian tumor that was the
size of two grapefruits, that person doesn't have much hope in more
chemo.

But that person started bombarding herself with nutrition and then her
CA125 steadily dropped over the space of about 6 months to 17. The
improvement in her appearance astounded the staff at her oncologist's
office in just two months.

When she stopped the things that made her cells die and started doing
the things that made her cells live, she got better. She's cancer free.

Choose whatever you want...just ask yourself while you are making your
choice if making your cells die or making them healthy is the wiser
choice.


Sorry my friend ... large studies and double-blind placebo trials are
the way cancer treatments are proven.


Sez who? You've been lied to. The only double-blind placebo trials are
for chemo. But those studies have NEVER proven the effectiveness of the
treatment. They are short term trials, sometimes 8 weeks, to see if
there is 50% tumor shrinkage....not to test whether the patient is
cured or not.

Shrinking tumors is child's play. You can shrink a tumor by pouring
Clorox on it.

Now on to radiation. There are no double-blind placebo trials that
prove radiation is a proven cancer treatment. NONE.

Double ditto that for surgery! There is NO double-blind, placebo proof
of the effectiveness of surgery for treating cancer.


You have absolutely no credibility
citing individual examples.


When multiple bones grow back on x-rays and tumors disappear, you have
solid scientific evidence of a cure. When a patient is a graduate of
Harvard and then from Yale's Medical School and he comes down with a
brain tumor that no one from Harvard or Yale can solve, and you get a
prediction of 2 months life expectancy, and the guy is cancer free 40
years later, you have solid scientific evidence of a cure.

Larry, you've fallen for the false notion that chemo, radiation and
surgery are all proven through double-blind, placebo controlled trials.
They aren't, but in your heart you want to believe it anyway.

If you want to defeat cancer, you'd better take a moment to reconsider
the lies that the promotors of cell death have fed you. You don't get
well by making yourself sicker. You get well by making your cells
healthier.

The concept is quite easy to grasp...even if they would prefer you
don't.




Until you do, please go spam another newsgroup.

Larry


Like I said, go spam somewhere else. You are trying to play on the suckers out there who don't know any better. It is YOU who has fallen for false notions. If you cannot deal with the concept of large studies
and double-blind clinical trials to prove efficacy ... then you have nothing worthwhile looking at. If you did, it would have been studied. And you absolutely wrong about clinical trials being 8 weeks ... I am not even a doctor and I know better ... and so does every other informed reader of this NG. No please go try to swindle people somewhere else.

Larry
.