Re: Ph Balancing (steph)
- From: down@xxxxxxxxxxxx (madiba)
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:22:19 +0200
J <macyinno@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
madiba wrote:You might, but I doubt whether Steph would have problems with a therapy
Peter Moran <pmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"J W" <jonboy42@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
Its very simple. If you have an idea about an alternative method of
Bottom line if someone comes here with a thought or idea let the
majority decide if it is something that they are willing to try or not
and keep your thoughts to yourself unless you have physically tried
them. History is riddled with dumb sounding ideas that went on to become
very useful ideas because intelligent people encourage free thinking and
new ideas. Ignorant people oppose anything that isn't tried and true
tested, even if it has been proven to be extremely costly and shown
only limited success. In otherwords if you aint got something good to
say, don't speak because people who are very ill with this disease do
not need negativity.
treating cancer put it in an alt.cancer newsgroup.
If and when your idea works verifiably, put it in this NG.
No thanks, he'll get the same answers, from me, Steph and many others.
J
thats been shown by reliable sources to work.. :-/
--
madiba
.
- References:
- Ph Balancing
- From: synchronicity
- Re: Ph Balancing
- From: Steph
- Re: Ph Balancing (steph)
- From: J W
- Re: Ph Balancing (steph)
- From: Peter Moran
- Re: Ph Balancing (steph)
- From: madiba
- Re: Ph Balancing (steph)
- From: J
- Ph Balancing
- Prev by Date: Re: Ph Balancing
- Next by Date: July 2006 Monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a Vitamin D deficiency cancer?"
- Previous by thread: Re: Ph Balancing (steph)
- Next by thread: Re: Ph Balancing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|