Re: cheap safe drug kills most cancers
- From: "moreofless" <moreofless@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Jan 2007 07:58:12 -0800
I did not say it was "safe", I said the "safety profile is known". All
drugs have positive and negative effects. Drugs are used for certain
purposes where the good effects exceed the bad effects. Chemo and
radiation are certainly "toxic" but the alternative might even be
worse.
J wrote:
moreofless wrote:
Since the safety profile of this drug is already known, I would guess
there are people with no other options that would be willing to do
their own trials.
If it's so safe, why's the University of Florida, trying to find something to
reverse its toxicity?
http://www.gcrc.ufl.edu/dca/NTBC/index.html
The lesson is don't believe everything you hear on the news.
J
.
- References:
- Re: cheap safe drug kills most cancers
- From: mainframetech
- Re: cheap safe drug kills most cancers
- From: moreofless
- Re: cheap safe drug kills most cancers
- From: J
- Re: cheap safe drug kills most cancers
- From: Laurie Forbes
- Re: cheap safe drug kills most cancers
- From: a2rjh
- Re: cheap safe drug kills most cancers
- From: moreofless
- Re: cheap safe drug kills most cancers
- From: J
- Re: cheap safe drug kills most cancers
- Prev by Date: Re: What other renal cancer treatments should a man try? (X ray chest shots)
- Next by Date: Re: QRe: Texas study suggests link between pollution, cancer
- Previous by thread: Re: cheap safe drug kills most cancers
- Next by thread: Re: cheap safe drug kills most cancers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|