Re: July 2007 monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"
- From: brightwinger <awthrawthr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:25:56 -0700
On Jul 18, 11:01 am, James Semmel <feetb...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
TO: All melanoma researchers, doctors, and patients.
Last month's post suggested why melanoma arises so much in moles.
Well, are moles themselves vitamin D deficiency tumors arising at
points of weakest circulation?
After all, wouldn't a growing baby inside the womb be susceptible to
periods of vitamin D deficiency? And won't the baby's skin show the
sign of that vitamin D depletion as the organ tries to synthesize
more? Indeed, what skin tumors of unknown etiology are present at
birth?
Actually, increased intake of vitamin D3 turns newly forming moles
lighter, so it is therefore reasonable to expect nothing different
from melanoma.
James Semmel
Albuquerque, New Mexico
reference:http://www.mpip.org/bb/shtml/389215.shtml
Last month's follow up to the 4th annual discussion: "Is melanoma
simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"
The Vitamin D in the emulsified fish oil I took was an important part
of my CURE in two weeks from Stage 4 cancer nine YEARS ago.
Kelley
awthrawthr...@...yahoo.com (remove the extra dots.)
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: When Cancer Attacks, Some Choose to Face the Disease Without Treatment
- Next by Date: This Week's NCI Cancer Bulletin: July 24 2007
- Previous by thread: July 2007 monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"
- Next by thread: July 2007 monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading