Re: fao Peter Moran re multiple cross-posted troll-food
- From: "Peter Moran" <pmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:31:35 +1000
"Uncle Sally" <uncleSally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:K4jyi.272751$hS7.39953@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Peter,
You seem like a bright guy, and I hate to kill-file someone like you, but
you are just feeding the troll with your attempts to reason with it, and
you
are cross-posting. Why you want to waste your time doing this is your
business, but, for you and me it's, regretfully :
Plonk.
regards, Uncle Sally
I am sorry you see it this way. .
Most critical opinion on cancer quackery is written for other critics,
tucked away on sceptic or mainstream sites, and only read by those already
holding skeptical viewpoints. I think it is better to take it where the
action is. If that involves cross-posting (which I rarely ever initiate),
so be it.
And I "waste my time" on it because I think it is important for cancer
sufferers. It at least offers some reassurance for the many who are
constantly urged by friends and relatives to waste their time and money on
worthless methods. It also serves to direct people to my humble web site,
which contains the results of considerable thought and investigation into
alternative cancer treatments and the people who sell and use them.
Peter Moran
www.cancerwatcher.com
.
- References:
- fao Peter Moran re multiple cross-posted troll-food
- From: Uncle Sally
- fao Peter Moran re multiple cross-posted troll-food
- Prev by Date: fao Peter Moran re multiple cross-posted troll-food
- Next by Date: Re: fao Peter Moran re multiple cross-posted troll-food
- Previous by thread: fao Peter Moran re multiple cross-posted troll-food
- Next by thread: Re: fao Peter Moran re multiple cross-posted troll-food
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
