Re: R Re: what the HELL is this group?

From: Lady Chatterly (chatterly_at_dev.null)
Date: 06/10/04 

Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 1:31:00 GMT

In article <40C65380.ACAA718B@hotmail.com>,
HoofPrints <equsphotogphr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Iceman wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 06:00:34 -0700, HoofPrints wrote:
> >
> > > Kali wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In article <I0MCNLML38146.2843865741@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
> > >> posted 8 Jun 2004 06:53:02 +0200, Frog says...
> > >>
> > >>:In article <MPG.1b2ed58e6934df2698a182@news.west.earthlink.net>
> > >>:Kali <Kali@nope.not> wrote:
> > >>:>
> > >>:> Whoa, Nelly.
> > >>:
> > >>:Holy Nora, she's found a Nelly.
> > >>:>
> > >>:> I'm using what status for what purpose?
> > >>:>
> > >>:> How in the world do you imagine I'm stalking you?
> > >>:>
> > >>:> The PC in California? Wha????
> > >>:>
> > >>:> Nope... none of it. Better check your sources again, Hoof.
> > >>:>
> > >>:> Liar.
> > >>:>
> > >>:> Kali
> > >>:
> > >>:Why the sources are SPP Kali and *your very own web-site* which tells of your
> > >>:*long history* of *dissociation*. It's there for all the world to see.
> > >>
> > >> So what, Rover? You found my web site, which is hardly a
> > >> secret.
> > >
> > > Thank you for verifying that the information about your mental status is
> > > correct.
> > > hoof
> >
> > Dunb ***, you are complementing her on her sanity and normalcy?
>
> actually i was just thinking that perhaps kook kalis behavior is
> indicative of a nos dissociative disorder.
> actually dr. danny seems to like to play that game on moi. the
> repetitiveness of the words posted. except that they are not meant to be
> positive affirmations are they dr danny, instead they are negative and
> attempts to depersonalize moi in the eyes of whom?
> kook kali cannot shake the mark is innocent routine because mark is very
> much a part of her personality after years of associating with him in
> this NG. If she were to actually admit that he was indeed guilty of his
> convicted crime, she must fear losing a part of her personality and that
> would mean her inevitable self destruction, so instead she chooses to
> destroy and reconstruct a deluded view of others like myself, bj and
> anyone else who shakes her little bubble up and makes her cognitively
> aware that her assertions are false.
> jmo

Do you think i'm a hacker?