Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here
From: Iceman (1c3m4n_at_chi-mafia.org)
Date: 06/22/04
- Next message: Kali: "Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here"
- Previous message: HoofPrints: "Re: That's Blown Your Legal Action Kimberley"
- In reply to: HoofPrints: "Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here"
- Next in thread: Kali: "Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here"
- Reply: Kali: "Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 04:03:35 GMT
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:36:21 -0700, HoofPrints wrote:
> Kali wrote:
>>
>> In article <a85b4c95.0406201626.4a822778@posting.google.com>,
>> posted 20 Jun 2004 17:26:57 -0700, Kim
>> hepautornagic@hotmail.com was in the mood to post and the
>> following gems of wisdom spewed forth...
>>
>> :On 20/06/2004 4:45 PM Eastern Standard Time
>>:Iceman 1c3m4n@chi-mafia.org
>>:
>> :On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:55:34 GMT, Kali wrote:
>>:
>>:> In article <s2l850b1stm4.dlg@icepick.org>, posted Sun, 20 Jun
>>:> 2004 19:33:12 GMT, Iceman 1c3m4n@chi-mafia.org was in the
>>:> mood to post and the following gems of wisdom spewed forth...
>>:>
>>:> :On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:19:28 GMT, Kali wrote:
>>:>:
>>:>:> In article <13vgpbv8d49gk.dlg@icepick.org>, posted Sun, 20
>>:>:> Jun 2004 18:51:48 GMT, Iceman 1c3m4n@chi-mafia.org was in the
>>:>:> mood to post and the following gems of wisdom spewed forth...
>>:>:>
>>:>:> :On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 11:35:17 -0700, HoofPrints wrote:
>>:>:>:
>>:>:>:> Learn Torts!!! It is not based on what *you believe, it is based
>>:on what
>>:>:>:> *I* believe.
>>:>:>:
>>:>:>:Which is also your basis for attacking Kim and calling the RCMP as
>>:well,
>>:>:>:eh?
>>:>:>:
>>:>:>:Add to that your reason for calling Alan Palmer and stalking him
>>:by your
>>:>:> :definition of stalking. Also numerous other incidents, like
>>:taking the time
>>:>:>:to find a phone number of a certain Lynn and calling her and
>>:telling her
>>:>:>:lies and misperceptions. that would constitute defamation of
>>:character and
>>:>:>:numerous other things. If you even had a legitimate claim to what
>>:you write
>>:>:>:then you blew it all right there. That act alone is actionable by
>>:me if I
>>:>:>:so chose.
>>:>:>
>>:>:> I think at this point any real friend of Hoofy's would
>>:>:> suggest she consult an attorney (not a web site or do-it-
>>:>:> yourself manual) about what constitutes harassment and
>>:>:> stalking. Then she should probably get on her knees and thank
>>:>:> the universe that the people she threatens are not litigious
>>:>:> individuals.
>>:>:>
>>:>:> Kali
>>:>:
>>:>:I agree.
>>:>:
>>:>:Funny.odd, at one point she realized that she could be sued by Kim
>>:after
>>:>:having gone RL on her and blew up on a full blown rant over it.
>>:>
>>:> Apparently Kim didn't follow through on it. Maybe that is
>>:> what she's counting on from others, as well. Kim, if you are
>>:> reading here, are you able to provide an update on the status
>>:> of your file?
>>:
>>:The status is dormant right now, I do regret to inform you. For
>>:several months last year my Father suffered with cancer and passed
>>:away in March 03. There are still some estate matters over his death
>>:that our family is dealing with.
>>
>> I lost my father a few years ago. Family matters are so much
>> more important than Usenet. Naturally there are things to
>> deal with - including grief - and it takes time. Please
>> accept my sincere condolences on your loss.
>>
>> I can divulge that I still have time
>>:to persue legal action against Lynne and my lawyer does have the
>>:entire report made by her, as well the information on the police visit
>>:to my home based on her report, and the followup report of the
>>:attending officer. Obviously the other threats etc. The only legal
>>:action so far, (which my lawyer has on file as well) has been from her
>> :deputy in Madera. Deputy Clarke, who has cautioned Lynne regarding her
>>:behavior regarding threats and harrasment on the internet. I believe
>> :deputy clarke spoke with her in Aug. 02. I could be wrong on the
>>:month.
>>
>> That was nearly two years ago. It obviously didn't make an
>> impression anyway.
>>
>>:My lawyer did advise not to send any further complaints to her board
>>:re: PT9971 and did advise that when and if I go through with it, he
>>:would take care of that as well.
>>
>> Is it true that she has been advised to have no contact with
>> you?
>>
>> Kali
>
> Yes, it is true, but then I posted about that when it happened, in fact
> I have printed out in hard copy each and every time she tried to
> initiate conversations with me from that day to the present.
> I also have a hard copy of the website which was posted elsewhere on the
> internet, with the map on it to my home and places where she had found
> my posts, like Talk: Abortion.
> I have found another NG where my residential address was prominently
> posted under a spoofed email addy, and the people in that NG were saying
> that I have a great case for defamation, especially if I lost any
> business over the horse molester comments.
> TaTa Kali, have a great day.
> hoof
First you have to find out who did it, then mebbe.
- Next message: Kali: "Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here"
- Previous message: HoofPrints: "Re: That's Blown Your Legal Action Kimberley"
- In reply to: HoofPrints: "Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here"
- Next in thread: Kali: "Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here"
- Reply: Kali: "Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
