Re: That's Blown Your Legal Action Kimberley

From: Kali (Kali_at_nope.not)
Date: 06/23/04 

Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:22:14 GMT

In article <40DA0D5A.A473675F@hotmail.com>, posted Wed, 23
Jun 2004 16:08:10 -0700, HoofPrints equsphotogphr@hotmail.com
was in the mood to post and the following gems of wisdom
spewed forth...

:
:
:Kali wrote:
:>
:> In article <40DA0435.55979A90@hotmail.com>, posted Wed, 23
:> Jun 2004 15:29:09 -0700, HoofPrints equsphotogphr@hotmail.com
:> was in the mood to post and the following gems of wisdom
:> spewed forth...
:>
:> :
:> :
:> :HoofPrints wrote:
:> :>
:> :> Kali wrote:
:> :> >
:> :> > In article <40D9F4F7.8FF3242B@hotmail.com>, posted Wed, 23
:> :> > Jun 2004 14:24:07 -0700, HoofPrints equsphotogphr@hotmail.com
:> :> > was in the mood to post and the following gems of wisdom
:> :> > spewed forth...
:> :> >
:> :> > :
:> :> > :
:> :> > :Kali wrote:
:> :> > :>
:> :> > :> In article <40D9EFCE.74292C33@hotmail.com>, posted Wed, 23
:> :> > :> Jun 2004 14:02:06 -0700, HoofPrints equsphotogphr@hotmail.com
:> :> > :> was in the mood to post and the following gems of wisdom
:> :> > :> spewed forth...
:> :> > :>
:> :> > :> :
:> :> > :> :
:> :> > :> :Kali wrote:
:> :> > :> :>
:> :> > :> :> In article <ec181702.0406231252.72aa6040@posting.google.com>,
:> :> > :> :> posted 23 Jun 2004 13:52:22 -0700, Kim
:> :> > :> :> hepautomagic@hotmail.com was in the mood to post and the
:> :> > :> :> following gems of wisdom spewed forth...
:> :> > :> :>
:> :> > :> :> :On: 23/06/2004 3:40 PM Eastern Standard Time
:> :> > :> :> :Kali Kali@nope.not Wrote:
:> :> > :> :> :Message-id: <MPG.1b4398a7a3c4d5de98a399@news.west.earthlink.net>
:> :> > :> :> :
:> :> > :> :> :In article <40D9DC0C.5302122B@hotmail.com>, posted Wed, 23
:> :> > :> :> :Jun 2004 12:37:48 -0700, HoofPrints equsphotogphr@hotmail.com
:> :> > :> :> :was in the mood to post and the following gems of wisdom
:> :> > :> :> :spewed forth...
:> :> > :> :> :
:> :> > :> :> ::
:> :> > :> :> ::
:> :> > :> :> ::HoofPrints wrote:
:> :> > :> :> ::>
:> :> > :> :> ::> Kali wrote:
:> :> > :> :> ::> >
:> :> > :> :> ::> > In article <40D97F1F.71369F30@hotmail.com>, posted Wed, 23
:> :> > :> :> ::> > Jun 2004 06:01:19 -0700, HoofPrints equsphotogphr@hotmail.com
:> :> > :> :> ::> > was in the mood to post and the following gems of wisdom
:> :> > :> :> ::> > spewed forth...
:> :> > :> :> ::> >
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :Jolly Swagman wrote:
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :>
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :> From : "Dan Rogers" <dlrogers@frontiernet.net>
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :> Message-ID : <%m5Cc.169$aY4.22@news01.roc.ny>
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :>
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :>
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :>
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :> >I'll help you
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :>
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :> No thanks *Dirty Dan*, Lynne won't be requiring any of your
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :> personal paraphilia counseling
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :You are right I don't need Danny's help.
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :he needs to see the Business and Professions code and also
:> :> > :> :> :California
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :code of Regulations to find the Psychiatric Technician law.
:> :> > :> :> ::> > :hoof
:> :> > :> :> ::> >
:> :> > :> :> ::> >
:> :> > :> :> ::> > Hey, didn't you mention once that your sister is an attorney?
:> :> > :> :> ::> > Don't you have lots of lawyers in the family? Have you run
:> :> > :> :> ::> > any of your horse manure by them? If not, is it because you
:> :> > :> :> ::> > know they would advise you to just shut up/quit posting?
:> :> > :> :> ::>
:> :> > :> :> ::> Thank you for the suggestion. My family does not think *highly* of
:> :> > :> :> :the
:> :> > :> :> ::> field of psychology.
:> :> > :> :> ::> In fact Dad has always said they are known for hanging up a
:> :> > :> :> :shingles and
:> :> > :> :> ::> acting like pros.
:> :> > :> :> ::> hoof
:> :> > :> :> ::
:> :> > :> :> ::And he also does not think highly of COPS, especially over zealous
:> :> > :> :> :ones.
:> :> > :> :> ::It seems they all seem to think they know the law, and in fact they
:> :> > :> :> :do
:> :> > :> :> ::not know all there is to know about the law.
:> :> > :> :> ::hoof
:> :> > :> :> :
:> :> > :> :> :>>So do I wait for one more self-follow up here, or what?
:> :> > :> :> :
:> :> > :> :> :Kali, I'm not kiddin, when she gets really polluted - ya could be
:> :> > :> :> :waitin til morn. I'v seen 160 poasties in one night, in one newsgroup
:> :> > :> :> :alone. Then when she woke up, she wrote: "scuse me, I just took my
:> :> > :> :> :viccoden, and haven't had my morning coffee yet". Then, spent hours
:> :> > :> :> :pulling all her poasties! (except the ones that she felt were sensible
:> :> > :> :> :by her judgement) Then came back, and did it all over again!
:> :> > :> :>
:> :> > :> :> A lot can be explained by her apparent addiction to
:> :> > :> :> narcotics. Vicodin can have an amnesic effect, too. What a
:> :> > :> :> Rush! lol
:> :> > :> :
:> :> > :> :oops, sorry but your smearing child in canada has always taken that post
:> :> > :> :out of context, (you 2 are birds of a feather I know), but just in case
:> :> > :> :you might be having a lucid moment. I was prescribed one script of
:> :> > :> :vicodin for my back, and could only manage to take a half a tab, which
:> :> > :> :still knocked me on my ***.
:> :> > :> :hoof
:> :> > :>
:> :> > :> Why shouldn't I take this and run with it, Goof? Isn't that
:> :> > :> what you'd do? Wouldn't you say you don't believe it, or that
:> :> > :> you know better? Isn't this kind of behavior the kind of
:> :> > :> thing that got you in a Bobo mess in the first place? And on
:> :> > :> that note, you got any dissociative disorder lames to toss?
:> :> > :> Want to make another diagnosis, or threaten someone who
:> :> > :> doesn't know any better with a 72 hour psychiatric hold?
:> :> > :>
:> :> > :> The why *wouldn't* I take it and run with it is a different
:> :> > :> matter. I find your behavior in this regard despicable.
:> :> > :>
:> :> > :> Despicable, despicable, despicable.
:> :> > :
:> :> > :WEll naturally you would find it despicable, look at the reason for
:> :> > :Marks conviction in Maine.
:> :> > :If you had your way, no one would be concerned for the safety and
:> :> > :welfare of children.
:> :> > :hoof
:> :> >
:> :> > You pretend to concern for the safety and welfare of children
:> :> > because it suits your kOOky agenda, that's all.
:> :> >
:> :> > Only a kOOk who couldn't win an argument over vaccinations in
:> :> > a hepatitis group would be deranged enough to fabricate a
:> :> > story of your opponent's drug abuse and file a false police
:> :> > report of drug abuse/child concern, which could actually put
:> :> > the woman's children in jeopardy of living in foster homes
:> :> > while their mother had to deal with your kOOky accusations.
:> :> >
:> :> > Fortunately for all concerned (including you - although
:> :> > you're too stupid to understand why) the officers who visited
:> :> > Kim's home in follow up to your bogus complaint weren't
:> :> > overzealous ninnys. If it had been any worse for Kim or her
:> :> > children, there is no doubt you'd be sitting in prison right
:> :> > now serving that one year misdemeanor sentence, saving money
:> :> > from your dishwashing duties to pay the fine, and being
:> :> > nominated for a Bobo award in auk.
:> :>
:> :> Do tell!!
:> :> Since I wouldn't be the ones picking up her child and removing it from
:> :> the home, and the Peele Regional Police would be making the call, I
:> :> highly doubt I would be sitting in jail.
:>
:> Oh yes you would. As soon as Kim had successfully defended
:> herself, you'd be dealt with for the misdemeanor you
:> committed.
:
:REally!! Is that what you really and truly think.

That's what I know. I doubt Kim would have given you the
luxury of all these months if it had been different.

:Or are you just trying to show your pet in canada how illiterate you
:really and truly are?

Illiterate?

:Go ahead and show off your expertise.

Expertise?

:If they had seen anything wrong in Kim's home, and picked up her child
:where is my liability for purposes of prosecution?

The point is that with child protective services, things can
happen based on suspicion, not evidence.

:You on the other hand *empowered* her by telling her about the PC in
:California, which abridged my public right to speech.

I pointed out to her that your filing of a false police
complaint was a demeanor in the state of California and
pointed her to their public access web site. How does this in
any way "abridge your public right to speech?" How is your
misdemeanor *my* fault, huh?

:She lied to my police dept. when she stated that she had received over
:3,000 emails from me, when the truth was, i never personally emailed
:her, and only argued with her in a public ng.

Prolly 3,000 posts. Or else a misunderstanding that would get
worked out. Even if she did lie about this, it doesn't change
what you did.

:> :> > Only a kOOk like you would accuse someone like me of not
:> :> > caring about children simply because I have suspended my
:> :> > judgement in Mark's case pending the outcome of his appeal.
:> :> >
:> :> > You truly are despicable. And stupidt!
:> :
:> :I am certain you feel the same way about the psychologist who determined
:> :that there was a valid reason for mark to be arrested, tired and
:> :convicted as well!!
:> :hoof
:>
:> You don't know much about how that works, do you, 'mandated
:> reporter"?
:
:And you think the woman is despicable and her mother too!!

I think that any man or woman (including you) who makes false
charges to police in an effort to exact revenge against that
person is despicable. Yes. If that is proven to be the case,
yes, I will say she is despicable. She can and will also be
held accountable for it. You, Hoof, can and should be held
accountable for what you did.

:And no doubt the judge who stated that Marks abuse of his profession
:should be dealt with on the basis of Zero Tolerance.
:hoof

When all the evidence is heard and one is certain of guilt,
this is very true.

Kali 

-- 
Troika Woman
Peter Hood #4
Sekrit Agent
CARNIVORE/3.0
section 811(c).
Quantcast