Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here
From: Peter J Ross (gadfly_at_NOSPAMmeow.org)
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: That's Blown Your Legal Action Kimberley"
- Previous message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: I think Iceman is telling *LIES* again.. now Iceman is *konfused*"
- In reply to: HoofPrints: "Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:49:04 GMT
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:36:21 -0700, HoofPrints wrote:
> Kali wrote:
>>
>> In article <a85b4c95.0406201626.4a822778@posting.google.com>,
>> posted 20 Jun 2004 17:26:57 -0700, Kim
>> hepautornagic@hotmail.com was in the mood to post and the
>> following gems of wisdom spewed forth...
>>
>> :On 20/06/2004 4:45 PM Eastern Standard Time
>> :Iceman 1c3m4n@chi-mafia.org
>> :
>> :On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:55:34 GMT, Kali wrote:
>> :
>> :> In article <s2l850b1stm4.dlg@icepick.org>, posted Sun, 20 Jun
>> :> 2004 19:33:12 GMT, Iceman 1c3m4n@chi-mafia.org was in the
>> :> mood to post and the following gems of wisdom spewed forth...
>> :>
>> :> :On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:19:28 GMT, Kali wrote:
>> :>:
>> :>:> In article <13vgpbv8d49gk.dlg@icepick.org>, posted Sun, 20
>> :>:> Jun 2004 18:51:48 GMT, Iceman 1c3m4n@chi-mafia.org was in the
>> :>:> mood to post and the following gems of wisdom spewed forth...
>> :>:>
>> :>:> :On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 11:35:17 -0700, HoofPrints wrote:
>> :>:>:
>> :>:>:> Learn Torts!!! It is not based on what *you believe, it is based
>> :on what
>> :>:>:> *I* believe.
>> :>:>:
>> :>:>:Which is also your basis for attacking Kim and calling the RCMP as
>> :well,
>> :>:>:eh?
>> :>:>:
>> :>:>:Add to that your reason for calling Alan Palmer and stalking him
>> :by your
>> :>:> :definition of stalking. Also numerous other incidents, like
>> :taking the time
>> :>:>:to find a phone number of a certain Lynn and calling her and
>> :telling her
>> :>:>:lies and misperceptions. that would constitute defamation of
>> :character and
>> :>:>:numerous other things. If you even had a legitimate claim to what
>> :you write
>> :>:>:then you blew it all right there. That act alone is actionable by
>> :me if I
>> :>:>:so chose.
>> :>:>
>> :>:> I think at this point any real friend of Hoofy's would
>> :>:> suggest she consult an attorney (not a web site or do-it-
>> :>:> yourself manual) about what constitutes harassment and
>> :>:> stalking. Then she should probably get on her knees and thank
>> :>:> the universe that the people she threatens are not litigious
>> :>:> individuals.
>> :>:>
>> :>:> Kali
>> :>:
>> :>:I agree.
>> :>:
>> :>:Funny.odd, at one point she realized that she could be sued by Kim
>> :after
>> :>:having gone RL on her and blew up on a full blown rant over it.
>> :>
>> :> Apparently Kim didn't follow through on it. Maybe that is
>> :> what she's counting on from others, as well. Kim, if you are
>> :> reading here, are you able to provide an update on the status
>> :> of your file?
>> :
>> :The status is dormant right now, I do regret to inform you. For
>> :several months last year my Father suffered with cancer and passed
>> :away in March 03. There are still some estate matters over his death
>> :that our family is dealing with.
>>
>> I lost my father a few years ago. Family matters are so much
>> more important than Usenet. Naturally there are things to
>> deal with - including grief - and it takes time. Please
>> accept my sincere condolences on your loss.
>>
>> I can divulge that I still have time
>> :to persue legal action against Lynne and my lawyer does have the
>> :entire report made by her, as well the information on the police visit
>> :to my home based on her report, and the followup report of the
>> :attending officer. Obviously the other threats etc. The only legal
>> :action so far, (which my lawyer has on file as well) has been from her
>> :deputy in Madera. Deputy Clarke, who has cautioned Lynne regarding her
>> :behavior regarding threats and harrasment on the internet. I believe
>> :deputy clarke spoke with her in Aug. 02. I could be wrong on the
>> :month.
>>
>> That was nearly two years ago. It obviously didn't make an
>> impression anyway.
>>
>> :My lawyer did advise not to send any further complaints to her board
>> :re: PT9971 and did advise that when and if I go through with it, he
>> :would take care of that as well.
>>
>> Is it true that she has been advised to have no contact with
>> you?
>>
>> Kali
>
> Yes, it is true, but then I posted about that when it happened, in fact
> I have printed out in hard copy each and every time she tried to
> initiate conversations with me from that day to the present.
> I also have a hard copy of the website which was posted elsewhere on the
> internet, with the map on it to my home and places where she had found
> my posts, like Talk: Abortion.
> I have found another NG where my residential address was prominently
> posted under a spoofed email addy, and the people in that NG were saying
> that I have a great case for defamation, especially if I lost any
> business over the horse molester comments.
> TaTa Kali, have a great day.
> hoof
Why don't you learn something about the law instead of fucking
stallions all day long, Goofy?
-- PJR :-) Licensed to practise kookology in the Empire of Meow (Remove NOSPAM to reply.)
- Next message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: That's Blown Your Legal Action Kimberley"
- Previous message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: I think Iceman is telling *LIES* again.. now Iceman is *konfused*"
- In reply to: HoofPrints: "Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]