Re: Status of Legal matters pursuant to goof.... was Git Yer LawsOOt Threat Here

From: Daedalus (jadeyb_at_my-deja.com)
Date: 06/24/04 

Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:08:51 GMT

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:31:15 GMT, Peter J Ross
<gadfly@NOSPAMmeow.org>, wrote:

>On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:13:38 +0200, Dr. Flonkenstein wrote:
>
>> Being tired of lurking, on Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:06:24 +0000, Daedalus
>> posted:
>>
>>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:59:13 +0200, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
>>> <gregoriy_raspoutine_NOSPAM_@hotmail.com>, wrote:
>>>
>>>> Being tired of lurking, on Mon, 21 Jun 2004 17:54:34 +0000, Daedalus
>>>> posted:
>>>>
>> hoof
>>>>>
>>>>> That sounded like a threat. A very dramatic one too, horseface.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jade
>>>>>
>>>> I responded in the same tone, Jade, before I read yours. What a
>>>> coincidence?
>>>
>>> How could you, myself and Kali all react the same way to what was quite
>>> obviously just a "metaphor"...?
>>>
>>> Jade
>>
>> Because we know how kooks behave?
>
>Both the General Theory of Kook Kollective Konsciousness and PJR's
>Specific Kookological Hypothesis (which states that all kooks are
>fundamentally identical at absolute zero on the clue scale) predicted
>this result.
>
>Both the accepted theory and my hypothesis imply that the only reason
>an individual kook hasn't issued any real-life threats is that the
>individual kook hasn't got around to it yet.
>
>We (tinw) are pleased to have independent confirmation of our
>experiments.

I agree with these findings and will begin watching Connor_a like a
hawk.

Although I think in his own passive way, he's already threatened
everyone.

Jade