Re: Lynne "Hoofprints" Lyons FAQ: v .01 <------ an arietta of cut-n-past and plagiarized shame

From: Pablo (nono_at_yes.com)
Date: 06/26/04 

Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 16:04:20 GMT

"HoofPrints" <equsphotogphr@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:40DD945B.F6796ECA@hotmail.com...
>
>
> Jolly Swagman wrote:
> >
> > From : Kali <Kali@nope.not>
> > Message-ID : <MPG.1b468831ebffcc5398a40f@news.east.earthlink.net>
> >
> >
> >
> > >warns others about your abuse of others on Usenet
> >
> > Forgive me for asking this question, which *others* does Lynne abuse ??
> >
> > HAMboner ?
> > Mom ?
> > You ?
> >
> > All three is a case of quid pro quo.. who else ??
> >
> > You're not very smart *mutton chops*, you are confident that Lynne is a
*kook*
> > but you and your rent-boys continue to bull-bait her.
> >
> > A smidgen of common sense would suggest, if she is the *real* thing and
you push
> > her off her feet, she has enough private info on you to make your RW
life very sticky
> >
> > I live on the other side of the globe, and if only half of what is on
your website
> > is fact, even *I* [if inclined that way] could tip your life inside out
or make
> > you gulp very hard. IMHO you are playing with a time bomb
> >
> > Contrary to your belief, I don't know the lady, but from what I've seen
and
> > read I congratulate her on her restraint for not claiming her pound of
flesh
> >
> > The only thing Lynne is guilty of is major side waffle and not having
the
> > ability or inclination to walk and talk like you fucknuckles do
>
> Truthfully Two, she thinks that she can write this up into some psych
> thesis and show the amount of stress that can be applied to a persons
> psyche, she will not use my real name nor title nor any other
> information in her thesis of course, but what she has not taken into
> consideration is that This is a public place, my real name, psych
> license, business license for Hoof Prints, emails address', old
> residential address', old telephone number, have all been used by her so
> she can write a thesis about usenet life on the internet.
> She also must be totally ignorant that I have not consented to be used
> in her study, and while she thinks that just because a persons posts to
> usenet that is an automatic consent to use others in a study, she is
> wrong.
> Especially since she is posting false criminal allegations against me.
> Kali, I have inferred this to this NG SPP in the past, yet you failed to
> heed the warning.
> It would be one thing if your allegations had an truth in them, but they
> are false, I have never been arrested, much less convicted of any crime,
> except on usenet by SPP thugs and of course hamboner and co.. If I had
> ever been arrested and convicted of a felony, I would not hold a valid
> active Psychiatric Technician License here in California.
> Now if your other subjects have indeed been convicted of the crimes
> which you claim them to be convicted of, then they have no standing to
> file any court action against you, because they were indeed found guilty
> of their crimes. But I am giving all of your *subjects* the benefit of
> a doubt, based on the types of crimes you and your friends have accused
> me of in *public*, and am willing to bet that your false criminal
> allegations against those persons are also false.
> Hence you have held real persons in a false light and you have done so
> in other public places where others may recognize my name in real life,
> and in places that I don't subscribe too.
>
> hoof

Your father is a a judge?

Have you talked over your posts with him?

Does he know his daughter is up to tomfoolery, which might end up in a
courtroom?

Don't forget to notify Court TV.

Pablo
brother of the Blood