Re: HAMboner in wiggle-mode...
From: jen (jen2gone_at_cs.com)
Date: 06/29/04
- Next message: Kim: "Re: FYI- Grooming and "Beaning""
- Previous message: jen: "Re: FYI- Grooming and "Beaning""
- In reply to: Kim: "Re: HAMboner in wiggle-mode..."
- Next in thread: Beowulf: "Re: HAMboner in wiggle-mode..."
- Reply:(deleted message) Beowulf: "Re: HAMboner in wiggle-mode..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Jun 2004 20:37:46 -0700
hepautornagic@hotmail.com (Kim) still trying to make something out of nothing, wrote in message news:<a85b4c95.0406280245.4fd5f349@posting.google.com>...
> Subject: Re: FYI- Grooming and "Beaning"
> From: hepautornagic@hotmail.com (Kim)
> Date: 28/06/2004 6:22 AM Eastern Standard Time
> Message-id: <a85b4c95.0406280222.7ad5f8a6@posting.google.com>
(Of course you thought something like that was a non issue. Would ya
> feel the same if it were you and your kid depicted?>>
> >WAS it you and your kid?>>
<<No. Not this time.>>
Of course not. It had nothing to do with you, so the purpose of that
question was what, to make it **sound** as though Lynne used YOUR
picture? So that you could convince someone to nail you to the cross
in order that you could play the martyr again? Typical.
<<Lynne said "I'm afraid I'm going to jail", >>
>>Can you post her exact words in context? I'll understand if you
>>decline.
>>Getting on with it, the rest reads:
<<SNIP-This is a job for my ratchet pruners.>>
<<Duh, she nuked most of her posts as you already know. >>
Just like you've nuked the ones that might have gotten you in a little
trouble, huh?
<<Is this you defence of Lynnes actions?>>
I'm not here to defend Lynne. This is about YOU. It's the "All
Hamboner All the Time Show", just like you've wanted since you were an
ickle gurl, tweetums.
<massive snippage>
>>Eeeww, that smells bad, doesn't it? Another whiff should do the
trick,
>>but you don't seem to pick up on things very quickly, and forget
them
>>even sooner, like the dog's name being "Bee". I mean, if what you
>>said above (On June 30th) is true about not knowing that a foxtail
>>was a weed, you had plenty of time to find out before you posted the
>>following on July 5th. And even if you did realize your mistake,
>>which is highly doubtful, did you apologize or admit it? Of course
>>not. You thought you could get enough people to fall for it, and you
>>just kept on trying to bait her. Classic HAMboner.
<<Whateva floats your boat there Jen. The friend your defending here
Lynne Lyons went real life on myeslf and continously threatens others
and has caused harm to others.>>
Do shaddap and stop squirming. Is that what you tell yourself to
justify your behavior? Does it make you feel better about yourself?
You brought it on, so you suck it down. You like
the smell of *** and can't stand it if you're not there to stir it.
<<From: hepautomagic@hotmail.com (Kim) Newsgroups:
sci.med.diseases.hepatitis Subject: Re: My Confession! Date: 5 Jul
2001 01:56:34 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 33
Message-ID: <ec181702.0107050056.1ef17182@posting.google.com>
References: <ec181702.0107031701.1690d4d@posting.google.com>
<20010704003407.04249.00002062@ng-ms1.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host:
209.161.232.230 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 994323394
13914 127.0.0.1 (5 Jul 2001 08:56:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To:
groups-support@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Jul 2001 08:56:34
As for dogs eating foxtails, if it happened here, animal control would
be called until the owner restained thier animal.
(IT WAS'NT LIKE HER DOG HAPPENED UPON A STACK OF TAILS, IT TORE THE
TAILS OFF LIVE FOXES) Whose a fool Jen?
Kim >>
<What is your entire point? Lynne posted Pornograpy.>>
My ENTIRE point has been made, and you've done all the work- thanks.
I'm haven't the slightest interest in the website Lynne posted, IF she
even posted it, and I have doubts about that, knowing you and your
"friends", sockpuppets, and AKAs.
No one forced you to click on that "disgusting" link, but you couldn't
have left it alone if your life depended on it. And what are you
griping about
anyway? Your own language is pornographic half the time.
Oh, and you needn't address the question about your meds, you posted
it yourself, along with the part about your cognitive disorders. Your
psych doc DID up the dosage to "blue", didn't he? A loooong time ago.
Considering the time frame, you should be up to what, 10 mg. 4x daily
by now?
So, POT KETTLE BLACK, k00k-GURL.
You get what you pay for, and I'm all about value.
Have a good day and thanks for stopping in!
jen
(The rest of Kim's whackjob post is left intact in order to protect
the idiot. I mean the "innocent". As it was originally posted to
Euronymous, I note that he/she/it did not see fit to address it
on their own.)
jen
_________________________________________________________________________
<<Get a grip maybe? Below is the original post you reply to. Since you
love to accuse me of creating diversion and manipulating, here's the
real thing in motion sweetums. :) I doubt anyone cares to unscramble
your bumbles, you've fooled and made fool of no one but yourself.
And please do us all a favor, when all else fails, run a spell check
on my poast.
Kim
Original Thread restored
Kim Wrote:
jen2gone@cs.com (jen) wrote in message
news:<bc5d9065.0406261903.37a8730c@posting.google.com>...
> Ever the voyeur, Euronymous must have followed every posted link on
> Usenet and in his/her infinite wisdom, writes...
>
> <<Bzzzzt. Wrong.
> The "Horsie Porn" was the pornographic picture your bean buddy
> maliciously
> posted. Remember that one babe? The one she lost her business site
> over? >>
>
> Actually, no, "babe". I did not view the picture. I was not
> interested, and considered it a non-issue.
> >Of course you thought something like that was a non issue. Would ya
I am normally not enticed
> to follow posted links, especially from people in these groups. I
> never visited her business site, and doubt that she has ever visited
> mine.
>
> <<The sexualized cleaning your bean buddy penned would be classified
> as
> horse erotica.>>
>
> Bull***. It's a non-issue
> >Another non issue??
blown out of proportion by a handful of
> sick minds. Get over it already.
> Have you delved into the psyche of my little "pet"? She once made
> a complete fool of herself by trying to make people believe that
> Lynne's dog was ranging throughout the countryside "ripping the tails
> off of live foxes" and should be put down. Why? Because Lynne said
> the dog got sick from eating foxtails...which most people understand
> is a common weed.
> >Lynne said "I'm afraid I'm going to jail", "Missy Blue (the dog) got
> >loose and ate a foxtail and is now very ill" We don't call the weed
> >foxtail here, we call it bullrush. What would anyone who had never
> >heard the term think? Why the hell would she state she was going to
> >jail because her dog ate a weed?
> >So, indeed I made the mistake and sounded foolish, and even I have to
> >laugh at my own words. But no harm came to anyone over it. Boy ---
> >hat a big evil doer I was in that one eh Jenifar? lol.
Correction: The dog in question was named "Bee" not "Missy Blue".
The sad thing is that Kim, being a complete and
> total ignoramus, didn't know what a Foxtail was, and actually believed
> that the dog was ripping the tails off of foxes.
Now that's a real issue!
Another gross example
> of word twisting and manipulation in order to create chaos. (Usually
> used when trying to draw attention away from something that she's
> particularly embarrassed about having said...)
ICBW, but IIRC, It was all in the same thread Lynne started about the
dog getting sick. All remarks by me were made after Lynne threatened,
and then did go real life. But of course, you'd call that a non issue
as well, so hey... to each his own.
Kim>>
>
>
> <<Do please try to keep up. ^_^>>
>
> When you come up with something relevant or of interest, I promise to
> give it my full and undivided attention. Until then, you may want to
> wipe that brown stuff from your upper lip.
>
> jen
- Next message: Kim: "Re: FYI- Grooming and "Beaning""
- Previous message: jen: "Re: FYI- Grooming and "Beaning""
- In reply to: Kim: "Re: HAMboner in wiggle-mode..."
- Next in thread: Beowulf: "Re: HAMboner in wiggle-mode..."
- Reply:(deleted message) Beowulf: "Re: HAMboner in wiggle-mode..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]