Re: PING: POM
From: hoofprints (equsphotogophr_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/17/04
- Next message: Alias: "Re: Scam"
- Previous message: Jen2Gone: "Re: PING: POM/Happy Holidays to all"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Iceman: "Re: PING: POM"
- Next in thread: Iceman: "Re: PING: POM"
- Reply:(deleted message) Iceman: "Re: PING: POM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:32:17 -0800
Iceman wrote:
>
> On 17 Dec 2004 10:18:54 -0000, Firebird wrote:
>
> > In article <1vddvl3uti41j$.dlg@icepick.org>
> > Iceman <1c3m4n@chi-mafia.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 16 Dec 2004 22:32:32 -0000, Firebird wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> That's capital "S" for Santa, Iceman.
> >>>
> >>> You been waiting for Moi to poast, or just stalking Lynne as usual?
> >>>
> >>> She not going to date you no matter how hard you try.
> >>>
> >>> Alan
> >>> ~~
> >>
> >> Miss me, eh? LOL
> >
> > Happy Christmas you lunkhead.
>
> Thanks and Merry Christmas to you.
>
> > Stll not realised you're batting for the wrong side?
> >
>
> Not one whit, there is no side, only peeps.
>
> >> As to dating Goofy even if she were much younger it is not something I
> >> would ever consider. That broad has so much excess baggage, no personality
> >> and nothing of interest. The fact that a couple peeps in here still have
> >> some interest in her says a lot about them. :)
> >
> > You know what Iceman? A woman who tells you to your face that she thinks you
> > are stupid when you are being stupid is worth 100 of the kind who spend their
> > lives whining about you to their friends at coffee mornings. I guess you must
> > still be young enough to think otherwise. Some such women ever boast about
> > their meetings to talk about others. How stupid is that? How even more stupid
> > is the man who trusts such women?
> >
> > Alan
>
> Alan what you say makes some sense, but you are using it to defend the
> undefendable.
And you gave advice to a Canadian re the California Legal system pumping
them full of the idea that they could 'sue' me!?!
You idiot!!
Even high school students know that if they are accused of a crime real
or imagined, they have the right to a defense.
So care to show us your 'superior' knowledge by claiming that someone is
'undefendable'?
hoof
How many times has she slammed those she went to bed with
> and/or married, posted personal chit about them and making excuses for her
> own proclivities? Then add to that the stuff she was emailed in private
> about only to post it later. She is a shameful wench without redeeming
> social values. It may be fun at times to yank her chain as the idiot
> responds to most everything, even bots. One does not have to be old to see
> her for what she is. Now consider your statement, "How even more stupid
> is the man who trusts such women?". Even if you see it I would not expect
> you to post it here, and you shouldn't. I'll leave it at that. EOS
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
- Next message: Alias: "Re: Scam"
- Previous message: Jen2Gone: "Re: PING: POM/Happy Holidays to all"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Iceman: "Re: PING: POM"
- Next in thread: Iceman: "Re: PING: POM"
- Reply:(deleted message) Iceman: "Re: PING: POM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
