Re: PING: POM
From: Gordo Mondragon (ga_mondragon_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/20/04
- Previous message: hoofprints: "Re: Santa and Elmo"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Iceman: "Re: PING: POM"
- Next in thread: Iceman: "Re: PING: POM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:18:36 GMT
In article <2ru7emwcb2m5.dlg@icepick.org>,
Iceman <1c3m4n@chi-mafia.org> wrote:
> On 20 Dec 2004 02:21:48 -0000, Firebird wrote:
>
> > In article <1mer2aghw1v1o$.dlg@icepick.org>
> > Iceman <1c3m4n@chi-mafia.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Alan what you say makes some sense, but you are using it to defend the
> >> undefendable. How many times has she slammed those
> >
> > When the people were about to stone the prostitute, didn't Jesus stand up
> > and
> > say
> >
> > "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone."
> >
> > Alan
>
> Again, yes, but she was repentant.
Interesting. So no matter how much sin you have you can throw stones at
unrepentant people?
I didn't know that it's written anywhere that jesus put this qualifier
on the statement. Is it something you made up or is it a recent change
made by the church?
- Previous message: hoofprints: "Re: Santa and Elmo"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Iceman: "Re: PING: POM"
- Next in thread: Iceman: "Re: PING: POM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|