Re: epiphany Says Uh-oh

In article <memo.20060117093303.676A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan) wrote:

> In article <memo.20060117090827.1000A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan) wrote:
>
> > In article <cigos1h40bvmcobbtti1bh2e3penoql9db@xxxxxxx>,
> > epiphany@xxxxxxxxxxx (epiphany) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Uh-oh
> > >
> > > http://www.capecodtoday.com/blogs/index.php/blogfather
> >
> > Oh yes. Thanks Iceman, or Peter. You always give yourself away.
> >
> > You keep forgetting that I am a natural skeptic, when you try to mess with
> > me. That was what got me into trouble in here, in the first place, and it
> > was certainly what got me into trouble with Anja. Do I believe in the
> > Christmas tree fairy? No! > > *s****
>
> On the other hand Licey Baby, is this site that I have had linked in for ages:
>
> http://www.kurtnimmo.com/
>
> Now, I agree that it is full of what you might call "conspiracy theories" but:
>
> http://www.rense.com/general69/goned.htm
>
> http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4054
>
> You know what? If I found myself living in a society where people make "death
> threats" against the owners of web-sites carrying "conspiracy theories" then
> I would start to question things, and make plans to move elsewhere, and
> having read what Rense says, I can see why *Hoofie* would be scared.

And d'yer know what else?

Voice of the White House January 15, 2006
TBR News.org ? January 15, 2006

?Now that we have brought Bush out of his mothball haven, it might be
instructive to discuss the means by which his shabby administration is
attempting to influence public opinion into accepting both his brilliant
leadership and the vital necessity for maintaining a senseless and viciously
destructive war.

It should be pretty obvious to persons with the ability to read and reason that
recent disclosures about official sponsoring of fake news articles brings any
governmental press release or speech into serious question. We have, for
example, the pathetic attempts on the part of Central Command to compel their
soldiers to sign printed letters to their hometown newspapers alleging that all
was well in Iraq, that the Americans were winning a great victory over the
Powers of Darkness and that GIs were bringing happiness and joy to Iraqi
children. David Brooks, writing in the New York Times, also produced such
fabricated drivel. Willie Peter bombs, flamethrowers and the running over by
tanks of Iraqi small children are never mentioned. Foreign reporters who have
had the temerity to do so have been shot on the spot ?by accident.?

Then we have various ?columnists? in the American media who were revealed to
have taken large amounts of money to advance the Republican?s agenda, the fake
?Lincoln Group,? ( a government creation) that was planting other fictions in
foreign (and domestic) media, the notice that the Department of Defense was
looking for blogs and websites willing, <>for pay<>, to put the government?s
agenda before the American people.

All of this has been reported in the past. What has <>not<> been reported is
that a number of the irrational bloggers (?Weather Control,? ?9/11 Secrets
Finally Revealed, ? ?Bush and Cheney Indicted by Federal Grand Jury) are also
supported so that they may issue immense volumes of distracting nonsense to keep
the American public so bemused that they wouldn?t recognize a truth if it hit
them in the food bag.

And also note that CNN (and other major media outlets) keep on bleating about
the Lacy Peterson matter, the fat man who fell off a cruise ship and of course,
who is allowed to forget the Vanished Cheerleader of Aruba. The harping on this
totally unimportant material is certainly far from either stupidity on the part
of network executives or lack of knowledge of far more important issues.

When a major story can be found on practically any foreign news service, like
Reuters, the BBC, AFP or the Herald Tribune, the assumption would be that our
American press would also reflect all of this. That it rarely does is a certain
sign that we are fed a diet of inconsequential or invented news to lull the
viewers, and readers, into a sense of security.

God may be in His heaven but all is certainly not all right with the world.

At least not ours.

It?s no wonder that newspaper subscribers and television viewers are turning to
the internet, nuts and all, for the real news. ?
www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2077.htm

And I keep telling you Liceman, that *nobody* in this country, not even the
Labour Party members who have been leaving the party in droves, kid themselves
that Blair is anything but the biggest liar that ever got to be Prime Minister,
and the House of Lords have once again stalled his damn ID cards scheme. He's
just a lame duck with failed policies, and the only one who refuses to accept
that fact is him, but for some reason most Americans still seem convinced that
Bush is doing a great job. When are you going to wake up?

*s****

http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/2006/01/american-freedom.html

http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/2006/01/every-competent-analyst-predicts.html



Lord Cerne Abbas

Humpty Dumpty Bush fell off the Iraq wall.
Humpty Dumpty Bush had a big fall.
All his spin doctors and all the President's men
couldn't put Humpty Dumpty Bush together again.

http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/identity.html

http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/mylinks.html

http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

.