Re: Survey about trust and participation in online communities
- From: "Waterspider" <nospam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:59:12 -0700
"Cactus Jammies" <cactusjammies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gv8Rh.39590$x9.6914@xxxxxxxxxxx
It's spoofs like this that make me think that if I was doing
epidemiological research on a subjective scale, I would offer to pay the
respondents for making out my answer and contact sheets.
Dunno... she's probably a legit student working on her thesis, but one that
neglected to study us users enough to know that most of us aren't
promiscuous with our email addys.
cactus jammies ========= money works where spam just sits there ========
pps get a grant ===
"Waterspider" <nospam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1318prpbrgg5pd0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hmmm.
I'll bet the response is pretty sad, considering that the first thing
you're asked to do is supply your e-mail addy.
.
- References:
- OT: Survey about trust and participation in online communities
- From: sryan
- Re: Survey about trust and participation in online communities
- From: Waterspider
- Re: Survey about trust and participation in online communities
- From: Cactus Jammies
- OT: Survey about trust and participation in online communities
- Prev by Date: Re: 'Homeopathy not a placebo theraphy'
- Next by Date: Chinese Medicine & Hepatitis C
- Previous by thread: Re: Survey about trust and participation in online communities
- Next by thread: Re: Survey about trust and participation in online communities
- Index(es):