Re: Bull's Eye Rash
From: Frank de Groot (franciad_at_online.no)
Date: 08/29/04
- Next message: Greatcod: "Re: Lyme disease diagnosed after 34 years"
- Previous message: V.Jean.G.: "Bull's Eye Rash"
- In reply to: V.Jean.G.: "Bull's Eye Rash"
- Next in thread: Martijn: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Reply: Martijn: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Reply: V.Jean.G.: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:19:04 +0200
"V.Jean.G." <Tijuana2@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:23985-413209EE-11@storefull-
> Doctors have difficulty comprehending viral infections
Lyme is not viral.
> we ask: is Lyme really Lyme or another viral infection ignored by the
> scientists and U.S. Government for nearly a century?
Lyme is not viral.
- Next message: Greatcod: "Re: Lyme disease diagnosed after 34 years"
- Previous message: V.Jean.G.: "Bull's Eye Rash"
- In reply to: V.Jean.G.: "Bull's Eye Rash"
- Next in thread: Martijn: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Reply: Martijn: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Reply: V.Jean.G.: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
