Re: Bull's Eye Rash
From: Martijn (Kw3Ls_at_hotmal.com)
Date: 08/29/04
- Next message: Martijn: "Re: Wake Up and Smell the Coffee"
- Previous message: Greatcod: "Re: Lyme disease diagnosed after 34 years"
- In reply to: Frank de Groot: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Next in thread: V.Jean.G.: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Reply: V.Jean.G.: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:12:55 +0200
"Frank de Groot" <franciad@online.no> schreef in bericht
news:ueoYc.3893$WW4.54184@news4.e.nsc.no...
> "V.Jean.G." <Tijuana2@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:23985-413209EE-11@storefull-
>
> > Doctors have difficulty comprehending viral infections
>
> Lyme is not viral.
>
> > we ask: is Lyme really Lyme or another viral infection ignored by the
> > scientists and U.S. Government for nearly a century?
>
> Lyme is not viral.
>
>
I already told her, but it's useless.
This is what "V.Jean.G." said earlier:
"Lyme Disease is NOT a bacterial infection spread by a bite of an infected
tic. It's caused by a virus that attacks the head. If it were bacterial,
symptoms would not return after antibiotic therapy."
..or the antibiotics didn't kill all of this bacterium, V.Jean.G.
- Next message: Martijn: "Re: Wake Up and Smell the Coffee"
- Previous message: Greatcod: "Re: Lyme disease diagnosed after 34 years"
- In reply to: Frank de Groot: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Next in thread: V.Jean.G.: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Reply: V.Jean.G.: "Re: Bull's Eye Rash"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
