Re: Protective niche for Borrelia burgdorferi to evade humoral immunity.

From: Frank de Groot (franciad_at_online.no)
Date: 10/01/04


Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:13:16 +0200


"derdrittemann" <derdrittemann2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> Yes, Frank...I have heard this...how many times, now? Are you even
> trying to pay attention to what I am saying?

I pay attention to what you are saying, although it is not really wise to
waste too much time on anonymous posters. For all I know you are a Steere's
or MacSweegan's 14-year old daughter.

You appear to be illogical and you appear not to have even the basic
knowledge on abx. & Lyme.

I will not do the homework of lazy/stupid people.
I simply allude to the facts, anyone who is not lazy can verify easily that
I am correct.

I do not answer your postings to engage in any sort of conversation with you
(you are beyond hope).
I merely mention the facts so that anyone who is not as lazy as you are, and
has better logical reasoning abilities, can check reality his or herself.

It is my duty as someone who has spent years in lit. research and clinical
research to debunk myths and give people a starting point to see for
themselves that certain avenues are dead ends. It is not my duty to do the
homework of anonymous punks. I don't have a rich husband, I am running a
software company and have no time to keep databases. I do not need to keep
databases bec. I remember the FACTS and I can use those facts because I can
think logically. No database needed. If you want a database, I suggest you
make one.

The burden of proof is with the person making the claims. You are making
claims that "bacteriostatics" won't work and I say you are just rambling
irrationally and gave you several handles on how you would find out that
indeed you are wrong. I am not going to spend days re-doing my research just
because you are a lazy obnoxious punk without the skill to do a Google
search, without the logic to discriminate between nonsensical fairy-tale
theories and hard science.

You come with theories w/o basis in reality. I do not need to quote studies
that talk about MIC in the BBB. Those are fundamental things that one is
supposed to learn on day one. Everybody knows that when an antibiotic can't
reach the brain, it can't kill the bacterium. It is preposterous that you
keep insisting on me "proving" it with "studies".

Nice that you have learned a new word "studies" but now you have to learn
what a "study" is, where to find them and how to interpret them.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: GOD=G_uv MESSAGE TO DEAN
    ... To recap George was saying people like movie stars are 'Grown' whilst ... George you and facts have a distant relationship. ... > this is due to the growth of the brain. ... A secular trend is about average height over time. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Michael Jacksons dead
    ... I'm saying the guitar is out of tune, ... you wish from those facts. ... documented facts, Jim. ... I made a personal value judgement about the guy's *actions*, ...
    (alt.guitar.bass)
  • Re: An OT question
    ... You're quite a humanitarian. ... Are you saying we shouldn't be there either. ... but like I said, facts don't matter. ... What does Reagan have to do with the arms race? ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: How Many ALL-SEC Preseason Selections Will Miss the Season?
    ... an institutional problem. ... That's like saying the War Between the ... I offerered only facts about the football players. ... -He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; he that dares not reason is a slave. ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: How Many ALL-SEC Preseason Selections Will Miss the Season?
    ... an institutional problem. ... That's like saying the War Between the ... severity of punishment until the problem is solved. ... I offerered only facts about the football players. ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)