Re: How to take action against anti-Lyme terrorists, developing story

From: A_Weisman (a_weisman_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/10/04

  • Next message: Neurolyme: "Re: NY OPMC Bill Current Status"
    Date: 9 Nov 2004 19:46:41 -0800
    
    

    "Frank de Groot" <franciad@online.no> wrote in message news:<01ckd.6429$Km6.163981@news4.e.nsc.no>...
    > Google responded already, even though I forgot to send the letter.

    LOL I guess they read your "mind" ?

    > Very good. Things move faster than I had expected.

    ROTFL

    > I keep people updated on how things develop from here (what happens is,
    > Google is legally obliged to provide me with the IP- & ISP info of the
    > criminal, info with which I can discover who the criminal is by in turn
    > obliging them to hand over their data).

    Well that is not a correct statement of the law you moron.

    Google is obligated to provide you exactly nothing at all.

    Except if you use an enforceable subpoena. Emphasize "enforceable."
    Meaning that you are not permitted to go on fishing expeditions and
    you have to have some basis for waht you're doing or trying to do
    legally.

    In fact if Google were to provide you with the information based on a
    simple (and I might add totally baseless) request, they would be
    violating their own privacy policy.

    >The lawsuit(s) becomes possible from
    > that point onwards, as is other action aimed at preventing the criminal from
    > acting out the threat of assasination.

    There was no threat of assasination you ***.

    On the other hand thanks for providing the roadmap so that everyone
    here can take action against YOU for your repeated threats of violence
    and assasination as well as terrorist acts.

    Stupid frickin terrorist.

    > -----
    >
    > Hi Frank,
    >
    > Thank you for your note. It would be helpful if you could provide us with
    > additional information, including the nature of the alleged crime and the
    > specific message IDs of the Google Groups posts in question. To locate the
    > message ID, please click on the link called 'Original Format' that will
    > appear beside the header (above the body) of the article in question.
    > After clicking this link, you will be taken to a text version of the
    > article that contains in-depth header information. Please find the line
    > called 'Message-ID' and copy and paste the content of that line (the
    > information between brackets) into your response.
    >
    > We appreciate your patience and cooperation.
    >
    > Regards,
    > The Google Team

    Nice automated form letter. LOL

    Boy when they get the requested message IDs and look at them they'll
    be ROTFL LOL since there is nothing that could reasonably be
    interpreted as a threat of assasination or any other crime.

    The fact that you claim that defamation is a "crime" in your failed
    home state is meaningless as there was no defamation and defamation is
    no crime in the United States.

    Moron.

    Plus the fact is that you ARE a frickin terrorist and have repeatedly
    made terroristic threats, threats to individuals and to the US in
    general. And applauded the terrorist attacks on the US/9/11 and those
    cowards who shot innocent children in the back at Beslan.

    Deny it all you want, everyone has caught your act.

    So please keep us updated on this developing non story.

    LOL ROTFL LMAO

    At least you're ridiculous fantasies are a bit amusing now.

    Much better than your threats and terrorism which isn't the least bit
    amusing. Pathetic and despicable but not amusing.

    Frank get a life.


  • Next message: Neurolyme: "Re: NY OPMC Bill Current Status"
  • Quantcast