Re: Lyme disease receptor identified in tick guts
From: A_Weisman (a_weisman_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/20/04
- Previous message: A_Weisman: "Greg: PA Bill (and others interested)"
- In reply to: Greatcod: "Re: Lyme disease receptor identified in tick guts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Nov 2004 13:50:45 -0800
Greatcod@Yahoo.com (Greatcod) wrote in message news:<caef409e.0411181611.7e74ad34@posting.google.com>...
> We don't know ,by Yale's "standards", how BB survives in people, or in
> what concentrations, so we focus on how BB survives in tickguts.
I guess in your ignorant and uninformed reactionary excuse for a mind
the two avenues of research are mutually exclusive?
However in reality they are not. In fact, they could be complementary.
Though lacking an understanding of basic science and medicine and
biology etc I can see how you fail to grasp this.
However given your obvious ignorance, why comment?
>Has
> Yale ever even acknowledged that Bb has the capacity to pentrate
> cells, and has alternative forms which evade antibiotic action?
I don't believe that "YALE" as in institution mandates one position on
such issues. To my knowledge, some of the doctors are aware of this,
AND agree it has some significance, some may not.
However it doesn't need the official approval of "Yale" to be true. Or
accepted outside "Yale."
And it might be true and have no real significance at least as you
conceive of it.
Nor would the fact that it were true, if it is, necessarily have the
implications you believe it might in all of your proud ignorance.
And it might be true but how does that affect this finding in some
negative way?
In addition, there is medicine and then there is science. SOme doctors
do only medicine, some do only science and may not even be doctors,
some do both.
Your overbroad generalizations aren't helpful except to your self
righteous and ignorant and endless boring ridiculous moralizing from
your beloved soapbox.
> Its all Yalecrap. The Science of Infection
What is is that you mean by this now recurring phrase "The science of
infection" which you seem to repeat in some pejorative way.
It is not a term used by doctors or scientists that I know of, and if
I heard it from someone else I might just as easily assume it referred
to human infection.
>being so much more
> important than
> the old Medical notion that healing people of sickness is the goal.
> What a cash cow Lyme has been for Yale. Criminal, really.
What is criminal is your reactionary nature, your obsessive and nearly
perfectly self absorbed tunnel vision, your baseless conspircy
theories of everything and your stupidity.
- Previous message: A_Weisman: "Greg: PA Bill (and others interested)"
- In reply to: Greatcod: "Re: Lyme disease receptor identified in tick guts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
