Re: Justice and SEC looking at Merck----Lyme criminals next???

From: derdrittemann (derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/27/04 

Date: 27 Nov 2004 12:24:19 -0800

Greatcod@Yahoo.com (Greatcod) wrote in message news:<caef409e.0411251745.1b790dbe@posting.google.com>...

"And to think, Justice started looking at Merck criminally without
> consulting the brilliant "Dertman for the Defense"...what went thru
> their minds???? The man is a LAWYER".

This is really, childish sophomoric and stupid, Fishead...even for
you. How old are you?

If Justice wants to proceed against Merck...then they will do so
because they think they have evidence that will support such an
action.

That is what myself and others have been asking for from you, K, L,...
whomever...and getting no responses. Where's the evidence of the
Lyme-related criminality?

You are right, however, Justice did not consult with me on this.

I somehow doubt that they will just blindly follow the "visionary's"
viewpoint, either.

I do, however, have the advantage of not being confined to a
psychiatric care facility.

I don't know if that lends any more credence to my opinions, here,
though...apparently not.

Relevant Pages