Re: NY OPMC Vetoes
GregGerber_at_hotmail.com
Date: 12/18/04
- Next message: dali: "Re: Medical Advice"
- Previous message: GregGerber_at_hotmail.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- In reply to: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- Next in thread: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- Reply: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Dec 2004 15:57:03 -0800
no I am not missing the point. You are saying either they did not
understand the bill would likely be vetoed or DID understand it but did
not explain it. I think they understood it and DID explain it. It was
clear to me they thought the bill would likely be vetoed. Now you may
not think the strategy of calling the governor is a good one in this
case. But that isn't really your beef. Instead, you are saying
something else -- that those who requested the calls lied by
misrepresenting the situation, and that isn't true. The situation has
been crystal clear to me for weeks, and I have no involvement beyond
reading posts on the internet just like you. I have gotten for weeks
that this bill would probably be vetoed. It appeared clear to me from
the wording and language in the posts. You keep arguing that those in
charge here either did not comprehend the situation or lied. I do not
think that either is true. GG
derdrittemann2003@yahoo.com wrote:
> You are completely missing the point, here, Greg.
>
> Either:
>
> 1. The "action alert" types are completely clueless and had almost no
> idea that Pataki was going to veto, or;
>
> 2. They called for the last minute "action alerts" knowing...or
having
> a good idea, that Pataki was going to veto;
>
> ...and thus needlessly and ass-coveringly "yanked the chains" of
their
> own constiutents...so that Pataki would be blamed for the failure.
>
> There are NO good options here.
>
> The end result is anger and resentment all around. And WHY?
>
> I am not going to bother to respond to the rest of your
> characterizations of my arguments as "nefarious"or "secret
> agendas"...because I simply didn't say anything approaching
that.(Greg,
> Greg, Greg)!!!
>
> I am talking about ...well...simply not knowing what you are doing in
a
> political arena.
>
> Not ready for prime-legislative time.
- Next message: dali: "Re: Medical Advice"
- Previous message: GregGerber_at_hotmail.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- In reply to: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- Next in thread: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- Reply: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|