Re: Let's IGNORE Lymeraja
From: dali (weeble_at_wabble.com)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- Previous message: GregGerber_at_hotmail.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- In reply to: Frank de Groot: "Re: Let's IGNORE Lymeraja"
- Next in thread: JWismille: "Re: Let's IGNORE Lymeraja"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:57:46 GMT
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:38:31 +0100, "Frank de Groot"
<franciad@online.no> wrote:
><a_weisman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1103897639.705675.131670@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>> I have noticed that increasingly lymeraja HAS been ignored and that
>> strategy seems to work best. Engaging with this moronic psychotic piece
>> of *** only seems to encourage it.
>>
>> So I for one am done.
>> Anyone else want to join me?
>
>
>On the contrary I decided to increase comms.
>
Conflict brings discussion which in turn yields the truth to those
open to it. Even Jwisimile the imposter brings something to the table.
- Next message: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- Previous message: GregGerber_at_hotmail.com: "Re: NY OPMC Vetoes"
- In reply to: Frank de Groot: "Re: Let's IGNORE Lymeraja"
- Next in thread: JWismille: "Re: Let's IGNORE Lymeraja"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]