Re: Bachynsky Sighting
From: WoodTick (WoodtickBb_at_aol.com)
Date: 12/26/04
- Next message: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: you really want to be active in the fight for lyme rights?"
- Previous message: PrincessKiara70: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Maybe in reply to: WoodTick: "Re: Bachynsky Sighting"
- Next in thread: ddcollucci_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Bachynsky Sighting"
- Reply: ddcollucci_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Bachynsky Sighting"
- Reply: ddcollucci_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Bachynsky Sighting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Dec 2004 17:42:50 -0800
Dutchess wrote:
> To whom it may concern:
>
> There was no "murder".
> Autopsy revealed that DNP did not cause this unfortunate death.
> The investigation is into the administrative systems.
>
>
The only autopsy on record, at this point, is one Bachynsky paid to
have performed. He died of "natural causes?" You think Bachynsky can
really pull that one off?
- Next message: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: you really want to be active in the fight for lyme rights?"
- Previous message: PrincessKiara70: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Maybe in reply to: WoodTick: "Re: Bachynsky Sighting"
- Next in thread: ddcollucci_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Bachynsky Sighting"
- Reply: ddcollucci_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Bachynsky Sighting"
- Reply: ddcollucci_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Bachynsky Sighting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]