Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists
derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com
Date: 12/29/04
- Next message: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Previous message: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- In reply to: GregGerber_at_hotmail.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Next in thread: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Reply: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Dec 2004 11:35:30 -0800
Greg:
"LDA is considered by most the major Lyme..."
That's a non-answer if I ever saw one.
In what sense is this "relationship"..."official"?
When you say that "LDA is considered by MOST"....in the above
statement...
...what does "by MOST" mean?
Was there an election...or a poll...and I didn't hear about it?
- Next message: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Previous message: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- In reply to: GregGerber_at_hotmail.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Next in thread: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Reply: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]