Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists
a_weisman_at_yahoo.com
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Previous message: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- In reply to: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Next in thread: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Dec 2004 16:13:20 -0800
derdrittemann2003@yahoo.com wrote:
> Greg:
>
> "LDA is considered by most the major Lyme..."
>
> That's a non-answer if I ever saw one.
>
> In what sense is this "relationship"..."official"?
>
> When you say that "LDA is considered by MOST"....in the above
> statement...
>
> ...what does "by MOST" mean?
> Was there an election...or a poll...and I didn't hear about it?
Yeah somehow I missed the announcement and the poll and the election
too. I missed the entire campaign!
Go figure!
- Next message: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Previous message: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- In reply to: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Next in thread: a_weisman_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|