Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists
From: zipzip (mcpucho_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Previous message: zipzip: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- In reply to: Rita Stanley: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Next in thread: Rita Stanley: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Reply: Rita Stanley: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Dec 2004 11:41:22 -0800
Rita Stanley wrote:
>These 'professionals' were sheep.
baaaahhhhh!
> Self-censoring, refusal to question, keeping others from "rocking the
> Lymeland boat"--what rot. Look at the mess Lymeland is in. Where is
> reasonableness?
shizer... i'm at a loss to answer that one! socrates is rolling over
in his grave, laughing! aristotle on the other hand is fuming.
> Stand back and look at what non-IDSA actually looks like:
> fringe and flaky; salt cures, and sputniks, 5 anti-microbials rotated
> willy-nilly, and cat's claw, heparin and quinolones and questran and
etc
> etc.
to be fair, you are grouping together the super fringe with some
reasonable dr's. but your point is understood all to well. the FDA
has to stop this insantiy of unregulated supplements, etc. they are
doing it in the EU, hopefully we will follow suit. nothing wrong with
rotating antimicrobials, just not "willy nilly". i don't understand
your complaint against quinolines specifically though except for the
problem of building up abx resistance.
what the hell is a sputnick... no wait i don't want to know, honestly.
> Believe what you want Lymeland. It's all yours.
thanks for the trojan horse!
- Next message: derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Previous message: zipzip: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- In reply to: Rita Stanley: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Next in thread: Rita Stanley: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Reply: Rita Stanley: "Re: In Praise of Lyme Activists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]