Re: This is silly

derdrittemann2003_at_yahoo.com
Date: 02/24/05 

Date: 24 Feb 2005 15:33:55 -0800

pmerv@direcway.com wrote:
> derdrittemann2 wrote:
> Lisa's previous attempt at "activism" landed her subject in a state
> psychiatric facility.
>
>
> "Can you back this up - cause/effect, not just guilt by association?
It
> seems to me the "subject" was well on her way without any outside
> assistance".

Soooo...you're acknowledging that, in your opinion, Kathleen had
mental/emotional problems, anyway...

...and want to quiibble over my choice of words...

...realizing that Lisa, in effect, was, in fact, cheerleading someone
on to their own doom?

Is that right, Phyllis? You jump in here becasue you want to play
lawyer with me?

HEY!!!

Where the hell were you during that business? I don't remember YOU
saying anything to anybody.

AND...what's the CALDA/LDA position here?

Does the LDA approve of patients going on hunger strikes?