Re: Shock and Awe- Denis Horgan

a_weisman_at_yahoo.com
Date: 03/19/05


Date: 19 Mar 2005 07:02:04 -0800


kathleen wrote:
> The Cowards speaks, once again.
>
> Weisman, recall at one point you posted here
> that I was "off the charts brilliant." That
> was soon after you suddenly appeared out of
> nowhere on this newsgroup, after my website
> went up on 2003.

KathLOON, I NEVER said anything like that. If I said you're off the
charts anything, I said you're off the charts INSANE.

You're NOT "brilliant." You're not even particularly bright.

In fact, in many demonstrable ways, you're really STUPID.

You've lost your children and instead of trying to get your life back
together after being incarcerated and institutionalized for over a
year, you spend your time writing endless off topic incoherent
conspiracy theory insane screeds here.

Get your life together. Get your children back. Throw your computer in
the trash. It is only going to get your right back in trouble.

You're on your way to doing life in prison on the installment plan.

> Recall also that after 5 years of appeals and
> finally a lawsuit against the Social Security
> Administration it was concluded that I was "too
> intelligent" and "too coherent" to be disabled.

KathLOON that is utter and complete bull***. You are neither
intelligent NOR coherent. Clearly you are one of the least coherent
people ever to live.

> That is as high as you can go, as is "very superior"
> intelligence. Excuse my genetic endowment. My father
> and nephew are exactly in the same way assessed. It
> is Autism, to excuse myself for being smarter than
> most men, at allegedly "men things":
>
http://www.indybay.org/archives/archive_by_id.php?id=2826&category_id=31
>
> You said so, yourself.

No kathLOON. I never did. You're hallucinating again. You need to get
some help and get back on some heavy duty meds.

Either way, you'll end up treated whether you do it voluntarily or
whether you're institutionalized against your will AGAIN.

> So, no one is fooled here by your attempts to
> discredit me. Everyone here wonders what else you
> *do with yourself*, when you are not ranting like
> a madman on these newsgroups, and doing absolutely
> nothing else.

KathLOON get some freaking help.

> You are not a lawyer or a law enforcement officer,
> or fighting in Iraq. You are not doing ANYTHING
> anyone would consider manly or honorable.

I never said I was any of the above.

Do you think that what you're doing is "honorable"?

Endlessly harassing and defaming people with your endless insane rants?

> You are a coward, and with every keystroke you
> seal your fate- On the day you stand before God
> we will all watch Him find you guilty of committing
> every sin, and you will be tossed into the fire.

Why don't you hold your breath until that happens?

> Along with your friends.

At least I have some friends.

>
> Think about it, all you do is come here and
> bitch like some demented, crabby, old man. And you
> do that consistently. Too stupid for words.

And all YOU do is come here and bitch you freaking lunatic.

> "Main Entry: aggressive
> Part of Speech: adjective 1
> Definition: belligerent
> Synonyms: advancing, antipathetic, assailing, attacking, barbaric,
> bellicose, combative, contentious, destructive, disruptive,
disturbing,
> encroaching, hawkish, hostile, intruding, intrusive, invading,
martial,
> offensive, pugnacious, quarrelsome, rapacious, threatening, warlike"
>
> ... stupid, can't think for themselves, can't think of
> anything orginal to say, inferiority complex, fear women,
> self-idolators, greedy, selfish, malicious, antisocial, evil...
>
>
> 'All those things that land a person in
> that very real black hole, which is hot rather
> than cold, for all eternity, and you never stop,
> which assures that outcome.
>
> Kathleen

KathLOON is your name NOT kathleen.

STOP cross posting. You are once again trying to hijack not only this
newsgroup but several others for YOUR own purposes to advance YOUR own
twisted sick insane agenda.

Do you realize people come here for information and help NOT for your
online insane blog?

Kathloon do yourself and us a favor and sign yourself back in. Stop the
lies the defamation the harassment. Get your life together woman.

Focus on that. Focus on trying to solve YOUR problems NOT everyone
else's. And stop making yourself everyone else's problem. THere are
many resources available to you. Use them don't abuse them.

How long do you think you're going to last like this? Before they send
you away again?

Hint: it won't be long.

>
> a_weisman@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Do you even realize that this is a discussion group about Lyme
> Disease?
> >
> > Why not go to alt.conspiracytheory.youreawhackjobkathloon
> >
> > And stop cross posting.
> >
> > It is obnoxious.
> >
> >
> > kathleen wrote:
> > >
> >
>
http://www.courant.com/travel/hc-dencol-0311,0,7120129.column?coll=hc-utility-travel
> > >
> > > Shock And Awe
> > > Denis Horgan
> > > WANDERINGS
> > >
> > > March 11 2005
> > >
> > > "Of" the people, unavoidably. "By" the people, sort of. But "for"
> the
> > > people? Two out of three ain't bad. Give the Rail Splitter credit
> for
> > > getting it mostly right, and there's no blaming him for not
> imagining
> > > what his Republican descendants would turn his party's philosophy
> > into:
> > >
> > > Government of, by and for the rich people.
> > >
> > > So obsessed with groveling at the feet of the wealthy, the
> > Republicans
> > > in Washington have in recent days abandoned even the pretence of
> > shame.
> > >
> > > In recent days, they let out a 24-karat howl when President Bush
> > > distantly suggested the far-away possibility of considering
raising
> > the
> > > cap on Social Security payments by the wealthy. By continuing to
> > assess
> > > the Social Security levy beyond the $90,000 lid, the government
> would
> > > raise some money to help what the Cry Wolf President is saying is
> the
> > > end of the world for Social Security. Having done the bogus "The
> Sky
> > Is
> > > Falling: Weapons of Mass Destruction" number to result in so many
> > dead
> > > in Iraq, he tries that with Social Security. But people aren't
> buying
> > > it. We've got a lemon from this guy already and his madcap plan
to
> > > enrich the rich Wall Street barons just isn't flying. So he
floated
> a
> > > trial balloon that they could extend upwards the cutoff,
requiring
> > the
> > > wealthy to pay just a few more bucks to support the "doomed"
> system.
> > >
> > > The war president had that hat handed to him by his own party.
DOA.
> > > They will not inconvenience the rich the tiniest bit. The wealthy
> > will
> > > not have to pay anything like the percentage of payments that the
> sad
> > > sacks down below have to endure. Not if the Republicans have
> anything
> > > to say about it. The rich are better than the rest, they say.
> > >
> > > Shortly thereafter, the GOP ("Greedy Old Patricians") scornfully
> and
> > > dismissively killed an effort to raise the minimum wage from its
> > paltry
> > > $5.25 level. The President and the Republican Congress laughed
the
> > > effort to pieces. They all-but asked, why don't they eat cake?,
> these
> > > lowly poor people.
> > >
> > > They won't stand for a single penny more going to people making
> $200
> > a
> > > week and not a single penny more being assessed of their precious
> > rich
> > > people getting the big paychecks. That says volumes about where
> their
> > > heart -- and wallet -- is.
> > >
> > > They make it harder for the regular person to declare bankruptcy,
> > while
> > > the rich can get away with fiscal murder -- and while the
> Republicans
> > > lead the federal government into a deficit-driven bankruptcy of
its
> > > own. To protect the rich contributors of the pharmaceutical
> industry,
> > > they make it much more difficult for regular people to buy vital
> > > medicines being sold in other countries; those self-same
> > pharmaceutical
> > > companies make neat profits selling the drugs to Canadians but
> > > seriously bloated profits selling the same to screwed-Americans.
> > >
> > > **** To protect the wealthy doctors and insurance companies, they
> > will
> > > try to wreck a sick and injured person's right to seek fair
> treatment
> > > in the courts. If you are poor, they despise you. If you are ill
> or
> > > demanding justice, you are a bother. ****
> > >
> > > But if you are rich, they will leave no stone unturned in the
> effort
> > to
> > > make you even richer.
> > >
> > > The War President's budget declares war on the poor, on farmers,
on
> > > veterans, on school kids, on municipal governments, on sick
people
> --
> > > while fighting more ferociously than even against the phantom
WMDs
> to
> > > preserve and extend the ghastly tax breaks lavished on the very
> rich.
> > >
> > > There was a time, supposedly, when the party of wealth and
> privilege
> > at
> > > least paid lip service to the rest of society. No more. They have
> > > declared war on the rest of us, and with the government in their
> > > pocket, it is "shock and awe" on the regular citizens who have it
> so
> > > hard getting through the day. One hopes that the groans of the
> > regular
> > > people under the Republican lash do not inconvenience the
serenity
> of
> > > the rich, counting their ever-expanding wealth; that would be the
> > last
> > > thing the party of Abraham Lincoln would wish.
> > > Copyright 2005, Hartford Courant
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Quantcast