Re: Re: lymerix question

a_weisman_at_yahoo.com
Date: 03/28/05 

Date: 28 Mar 2005 07:40:39 -0800

kathleen wrote:
> eugeneshapiroisapig wrote:
> > OK...what I am wondering is, has anyone really figured out what
> caused
> > the banding? I am getting from this that it's either a result of
> > asymptomatic infection, or the ospa degrading or conflating into
> > smaller or larger particles. If the second is true, surely that can
> be
> > investigated in the laboratory. That would seem to be important.
Who
> is
> > working on this?
>
> The important question is, how did they
> conduct vaccine trials and conclude they
> have safe and effective vaccines if they could
> not read their blots all along, and therefore
> not even in the animal trials?

That wasn't the question he asked.

And though there is a thread of validity in the point you're trying to
make, you not made it coherently or accurately.

Good try though considering how freaking totally insane you are.

> It never should have gone to human trials.

Perhaps not.

> > And what happens, for instance, when OspB is injected instead of
> OspA?
> > And what exactly do molloy's ospA-less Bb western blots look like?
I
> > mean, what are they seeing in contrast to wild-type Bb?
> > If anyone has any answers, please post. Thanks, weisman.
>
>
> The vaccine was a liposome of OspA.
>
> That explains why there were multiple bands
> and blot smudging. They did not know *what*
> they were injecting people with. An Osp A
> blob.

Incoherent babbletary.

> What are you asking weisman for? He is not
> a chemist.

Are you back to the freaking claim that chemists are some kind of
demigods?

So what? YOu're NOT a chemist either. You're a freaking FELON. And a
PROVEN LIAR. Who had her children taken away because of abuse and
neglect. You're a FRAUD.

> In fact, that's the reason he hates
> me so much.

We PITY you. We find you ANNOYING and SELFISH and a LIAR.

<SNIP>

> This is weisman:
>
http://www.lymenet.org/SupportGroups/UnitedStates/Pennsylvania/LYMECURE.shtml
>
> Joel Shmukler. The lawyer.
>
> Kathleen

I thought I was McSweegan? So much of your conspiracy babble is built
upon you and lisa arguing the absolute fact that I was McSweegan? Now
I'm someone else? Who am I next? Sadaam Hussein?

Give it up kathLOOOOOOON

They're coming to take you away. Take you today. Or tomorrow. Soon. But
not soon enough.

Have fun. This time you're a prior offender. Maybe it will be five
years next time?

Relevant Pages