Re: Dark field microscopy

From: Martijn <Kw3Ls@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:07:49 +0200

eugeneshapiroisapig wrote:

     Dark field microscopy is nice, but it has a low yield and many LD
patients will be negative by this method.

Antibody-tests suck too, but are used anyway to "diagnose" Lyme disease. At least with DFM you can show an active infection. It is used to diagnose syphilis and relapsing fever, so why not Lyme disease?

References:
- Re: Dark field microscopy
  - From: eugeneshapiroisapig

Prev by Date: suck out pathogens with a mini-pump?
Next by Date: Re: Phyllis: Activists Say YIKES We need to KILL the MD BILL! LOL
Previous by thread: Re: Dark field microscopy
Next by thread: Santa CRuz County Tick-Borne Disease SUpport Group*)!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread