Re: suck out pathogens with a mini-pump?


Frank de Groot wrote:
> "Martijn" <Kw3Ls@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

<SNIP>

> The real problem we face is of a criminal nature, not medical.

Not criminal in the legal sense. Criminal as in amoral. Not criminal as
in violating any criminal statute.

> Kathleen is right with her RICO allegation.

No she isn't. And if you think she is, you're as certifiable as she is.
And as ignorant of the RICO law.

>Insurance companies racketeer
> with test manufacturers to deny us treatment.

What do the test manufacturers get out of it?

> They ensure the testers a
> market(otherwise the insurers go somewhere else)

But the insurers don't choose the labs, the doctors do (with some
exceptions but usually it is the doctor who chooses a lab if the
insurer requires them to but not a particular lab).

Lyme testing is unreliable from all labs.

It isn't a conspiracy that the tests suck. Some things are hard to test
for accurately.

>and they insure themselves
> of max. profit. At least that's what they think, because they still
don't
> know that Lyme causes them perhaps a lot more, long-term.

Take this bullpoopy to alt conspiracy theory for whackos

.