Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- From: "a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx" <a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Apr 2005 17:45:30 -0700
eugeneshapiroisapig wrote:
> actually, as shocking as it may be, I believe that it is true that
> kathleens terms of released were no criticism of certain officals
> without prior court approval.
That's what kathLOOOON says but I bet my anonymity that is not true.
Listen when kathLOOOON interprets something in a particular fashion you
can rest assured that reality is far from that.
It is not possible that any court in the United States would issue such
an order.
I guarantee you that she was ordered NOT to threaten or harass the same
folks she spent months probably years harassing and threatening.
And that she wasn't compliant with her med orders too.
I bet anything
.
- References:
- Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- From: a_weisman
- Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- From: a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- From: a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- From: a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- From: zipzip
- Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- From: zipzip
- Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- From: derdrittemann2003
- Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- From: eugeneshapiroisapig
- Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- Prev by Date: Re: More on Klempner's deceptiveness
- Next by Date: Re: More on Klempner's deceptiveness
- Previous by thread: Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- Next by thread: Re: Going on 48 Hours (shhhhhh)
- Index(es):