Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: "a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx" <a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Apr 2005 19:12:42 -0700
Uhhh sure this all makes so much sense.
(to you alone).
PS: You're a PROVEN LIAR kathLOOOOON so you've contradicted yourself in
the midst of all your babbling rants.
Why not just give it up already?
No one is buying your lies and your fraud.
You should be ashamed of yourself though i guess since you have no
conscience you're not. Doesn't bother you that you have harassed
insulted defamed threatened a bunch of good people with good names.
DOesn't mean anything to you since your name is MUD.
Since YOU're THe CONVICTED FELON, proven child abuser neglecter whose
attacked everyone who tried to help her including her own family.
Gee you even attacked the people who supported you because in your view
they werent' doing it well enough.
Get a grip. And please put us out of your misery.
And stop polluting the internet with your nonsense.
YOu're really a despicable POS.
kathleen wrote:
> Women are generally left brain dominant, and the
> best liars, and also the best lawyers.
>
> Men are generally more right brain dominant and
> more often scientists and engineers.
>
> Except autistic females, who are right brain
> dominant (visual spatial abilities), like
> Temple Grandin.
>
> How many lawyers do you know who are scientists?
>
> Notice that McSweegan actually doesn't do any
> actual science work, making him not the brilliant
> person he claims to be, yet he knows a great deal
> about how to commit fraud (lie).
>
> Lawyers and scientists are usually mutually
> exclusive, except in the Lyme world, which is,
> hugely, scientists' fraud. Think about it.
> Would we ever equate Steere with Einstein.
>
> The evidence is the NO VACCINE and the NO PROGRESS
> in 30 years.
>
> I always have to explain the obvious. Lying is
> hatred, and results in intellectual blindness.
> Ie., is stupid. It makes no sense to lie. Thus,
> real scientists and lawyers are mutually exclusive.
>
>
> Example of how stupid lawyers are: Juveniles
> can be tried as adults, and not declared inherently
> *incompetent,* even though they obviously have no
> right to their own person, because their parents
> sign off on medical treatment. Or whoever else
> illegally owns them, in the case of ...
>
> Living with such duality of "reason" is the domain
> of lawyers. And obviously Psychiatrists, since
> where do they ever weigh in on this obvious
> conflict? Juveniles and competency? Or Lyme and
> brains? (Obvious exceptions: ILADS, MMI and
> Fallon)
>
>
> You stupid-man Martijn!!!
>
> Kathleen
>
> - - - - - - - -
>
> Martijn wrote:
> > kathleen wrote:
> >
> > > Lawyers have extremely illogical
> > > brains, that's why women make
> > > the best lawyers.
> >
> > ROFL
> >
> > What an unbelievable ridiculous but funny sentence, which makes no
> sense
> > at all. :)
> >
> > You funny-woman, Kathleen!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: kathleen
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- References:
- Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: melvin
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: kathleen
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: WoodTick
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: kathleen
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: WoodTick
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: kathleen
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: Martijn
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: kathleen
- Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- Next by Date: Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- Next by thread: Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- Index(es):