Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire

Everything I ever wrote is true
and I cannot be sued for slander.

There is not ONE THING, that anyone
can prove I ever wrote, that isn't true.

Therefore, you come out here and rant
and rage like a lunatic, much like all
the other people I had to expose, who
are hardly out of the woods, as far
as the USDOJ.

You can't present false information to
the FBI, in case you forgot.

Kathleen

- - - - - -

a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Uhhh sure this all makes so much sense.
>
> (to you alone).
>
> PS: You're a PROVEN LIAR kathLOOOOON so you've contradicted yourself
in
> the midst of all your babbling rants.
>
> Why not just give it up already?
>
> No one is buying your lies and your fraud.
>
> You should be ashamed of yourself though i guess since you have no
> conscience you're not. Doesn't bother you that you have harassed
> insulted defamed threatened a bunch of good people with good names.
>
> DOesn't mean anything to you since your name is MUD.
>
> Since YOU're THe CONVICTED FELON, proven child abuser neglecter whose
> attacked everyone who tried to help her including her own family.
>
> Gee you even attacked the people who supported you because in your
view
> they werent' doing it well enough.
>
> Get a grip. And please put us out of your misery.
>
> And stop polluting the internet with your nonsense.
>
> YOu're really a despicable POS.
>
>
> kathleen wrote:
> > Women are generally left brain dominant, and the
> > best liars, and also the best lawyers.
> >
> > Men are generally more right brain dominant and
> > more often scientists and engineers.
> >
> > Except autistic females, who are right brain
> > dominant (visual spatial abilities), like
> > Temple Grandin.
> >
> > How many lawyers do you know who are scientists?
> >
> > Notice that McSweegan actually doesn't do any
> > actual science work, making him not the brilliant
> > person he claims to be, yet he knows a great deal
> > about how to commit fraud (lie).
> >
> > Lawyers and scientists are usually mutually
> > exclusive, except in the Lyme world, which is,
> > hugely, scientists' fraud. Think about it.
> > Would we ever equate Steere with Einstein.
> >
> > The evidence is the NO VACCINE and the NO PROGRESS
> > in 30 years.
> >
> > I always have to explain the obvious. Lying is
> > hatred, and results in intellectual blindness.
> > Ie., is stupid. It makes no sense to lie. Thus,
> > real scientists and lawyers are mutually exclusive.
> >
> >
> > Example of how stupid lawyers are: Juveniles
> > can be tried as adults, and not declared inherently
> > *incompetent,* even though they obviously have no
> > right to their own person, because their parents
> > sign off on medical treatment. Or whoever else
> > illegally owns them, in the case of ...
> >
> > Living with such duality of "reason" is the domain
> > of lawyers. And obviously Psychiatrists, since
> > where do they ever weigh in on this obvious
> > conflict? Juveniles and competency? Or Lyme and
> > brains? (Obvious exceptions: ILADS, MMI and
> > Fallon)
> >
> >
> > You stupid-man Martijn!!!
> >
> > Kathleen
> >
> > - - - - - - - -
> >
> > Martijn wrote:
> > > kathleen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Lawyers have extremely illogical
> > > > brains, that's why women make
> > > > the best lawyers.
> > >
> > > ROFL
> > >
> > > What an unbelievable ridiculous but funny sentence, which makes
no
> > sense
> > > at all. :)
> > >
> > > You funny-woman, Kathleen!

.

Quantcast