Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: "a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx" <a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Apr 2005 19:29:05 -0700
kathleen wrote:
> Everything I ever wrote is true
> and I cannot be sued for slander.
Well was it true when you put down on your website registration that
you were affiliated with PFizer at the time? NO.
Was it true when you LIED and told people it was a child custody case
but it was really a criminal case? NO
Was it true that Lymeraft was a properly registered charity? NO
the list of your lies and slander against good people is too long to
even believe.
All your lies about your lawyers, your ex husband, the DCF workers, the
Judges, social workers, psychatrists etc ad infinitum.
You lied and lied and lied although perhaps in your completely
delusional state you actually believe the nonsense that you post.
And there IS NO FREAKING RICO COMPLAINT.
Another huge lie.
> There is not ONE THING, that anyone
> can prove I ever wrote, that isn't true.
Pretty much everything you've said is not true.
> Therefore, you come out here and rant
> and rage like a lunatic, much like all
> the other people I had to expose, who
> are hardly out of the woods, as far
> as the USDOJ.
LOL Yeah I'm sure they're worried kathLOOOOON.
Just like I am. LOL ROTFL LMAO
You're a petty little lunatic tyrant. You and your nazi friend Lisa
both psychotic monster moms delusional sociopathic freaks.
> You can't present false information to
> the FBI, in case you forgot.
I'm not the one contacting the FBI. You are. And they've got a file on
you not on me or anyone else.
Because after all YOU'RE THE CONVICtED FELON. Proven liar. Who had her
kids taken away because of abuse/neglect.
True.
> Kathleen
Funny thing how you go ape *** when people tell the TRUTH about YOU.
Sling all the mud you want because it all bounces of everyone else and
sticks right to you.
Get a grip. Get some help. Take advantage of the resources available to
you. Take your meds. Abide by the terms of your release. See your
shrinks. Concentrate on getting your life together, repairing the
damage you've done to your relationships with family and your kids. Any
normal mother would at least TRY to get her kids back.
But not you. Because you're so far from normal that a rocket ship
couldn't get you there.
And yeah I'm sure you're right: and the rest of the entire planet is
stupid and crazy NOT you! LOL
>
> - - - - - -
>
> a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Uhhh sure this all makes so much sense.
> >
> > (to you alone).
> >
> > PS: You're a PROVEN LIAR kathLOOOOON so you've contradicted
yourself
> in
> > the midst of all your babbling rants.
> >
> > Why not just give it up already?
> >
> > No one is buying your lies and your fraud.
> >
> > You should be ashamed of yourself though i guess since you have no
> > conscience you're not. Doesn't bother you that you have harassed
> > insulted defamed threatened a bunch of good people with good names.
> >
> > DOesn't mean anything to you since your name is MUD.
> >
> > Since YOU're THe CONVICTED FELON, proven child abuser neglecter
whose
> > attacked everyone who tried to help her including her own family.
> >
> > Gee you even attacked the people who supported you because in your
> view
> > they werent' doing it well enough.
> >
> > Get a grip. And please put us out of your misery.
> >
> > And stop polluting the internet with your nonsense.
> >
> > YOu're really a despicable POS.
> >
> >
> > kathleen wrote:
> > > Women are generally left brain dominant, and the
> > > best liars, and also the best lawyers.
> > >
> > > Men are generally more right brain dominant and
> > > more often scientists and engineers.
> > >
> > > Except autistic females, who are right brain
> > > dominant (visual spatial abilities), like
> > > Temple Grandin.
> > >
> > > How many lawyers do you know who are scientists?
> > >
> > > Notice that McSweegan actually doesn't do any
> > > actual science work, making him not the brilliant
> > > person he claims to be, yet he knows a great deal
> > > about how to commit fraud (lie).
> > >
> > > Lawyers and scientists are usually mutually
> > > exclusive, except in the Lyme world, which is,
> > > hugely, scientists' fraud. Think about it.
> > > Would we ever equate Steere with Einstein.
> > >
> > > The evidence is the NO VACCINE and the NO PROGRESS
> > > in 30 years.
> > >
> > > I always have to explain the obvious. Lying is
> > > hatred, and results in intellectual blindness.
> > > Ie., is stupid. It makes no sense to lie. Thus,
> > > real scientists and lawyers are mutually exclusive.
> > >
> > >
> > > Example of how stupid lawyers are: Juveniles
> > > can be tried as adults, and not declared inherently
> > > *incompetent,* even though they obviously have no
> > > right to their own person, because their parents
> > > sign off on medical treatment. Or whoever else
> > > illegally owns them, in the case of ...
> > >
> > > Living with such duality of "reason" is the domain
> > > of lawyers. And obviously Psychiatrists, since
> > > where do they ever weigh in on this obvious
> > > conflict? Juveniles and competency? Or Lyme and
> > > brains? (Obvious exceptions: ILADS, MMI and
> > > Fallon)
> > >
> > >
> > > You stupid-man Martijn!!!
> > >
> > > Kathleen
> > >
> > > - - - - - - - -
> > >
> > > Martijn wrote:
> > > > kathleen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Lawyers have extremely illogical
> > > > > brains, that's why women make
> > > > > the best lawyers.
> > > >
> > > > ROFL
> > > >
> > > > What an unbelievable ridiculous but funny sentence, which makes
> no
> > > sense
> > > > at all. :)
> > > >
> > > > You funny-woman, Kathleen!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: KathLOOOOOOOOON You're a Real POS
- From: a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: KathLOOOOOOOOON You're a Real POS
- References:
- Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: melvin
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: kathleen
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: WoodTick
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: kathleen
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: WoodTick
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: kathleen
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: Martijn
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: kathleen
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: a_weisman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- From: kathleen
- Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- Prev by Date: Re: UnWeisman...Re: ILADS and LDA meetings in Oct
- Next by Date: Re: UnWeisman...Re: ILADS and LDA meetings in Oct
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about joel schmukler, esquire
- Next by thread: Re: KathLOOOOOOOOON You're a Real POS
- Index(es):