Re: pig driteman


lyme rayja wrote:
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> lyme rayja wrote:
>
> "The message by Chuck P adams making the false allegation that
Kathleen
> would drive her kids into the Long Island sound is archived
> permamently on this list where anyone can find it via google. The
> records of Kathleen's DCF case proving that this very allegation was
> made for the first time just a few days after Chuck made his psychic
> prediction are with Kathleen, her lawyer and the Court. The record of
> the private I-M conversation where "chuck" told me it was all a
"lucky
> guess" are on my hard disk, and the AoL server".
>
> "All can be produced in a courtroom when and if necessary".

What in the hell for?

First of all it's hearsay...with no relevance to anything whatever.

Second...ever hear of Susan Smith? That case was pretty fresh in
everyone's minds awhile back...in fact, while all that idiocy was going
on, there was a "copycat" killing...same method...boyfriend pulled the
emergency brake on two little kids while the mother watched them drown.
The fact that Chuck referenced the damn thing has no relevance
whatever. If Chuck mentioned it...maybe Kathleen did, too...hell, I
don't have any idea...but the fact that Chuck mentioned it...you have
to be really nuts to assume people on this board were somehow in
ncommunication with the "government".

Is this an example of your thought process? Yeah...that's friggin'
logical. 2+2=666.

Idiot.
>
> "The posts proving the close friendship and concerted activity
between
> you, "Weisman" and "Chuck" are all available in the archive of this
> group, should anyone care to look".

LMAO!!! I have never spoken to anyone on this board off the
board...save a very old communication to Weisman concerning a
discussion we were having about the standard of care with Greg Gerber.
I also told him, for the record, as I recall, that I regretted having
to confront Kathleen so vigorously, as she was obviously struggling and
having problems...but that it was necessary...people needed to see what
was going on and be fully informed so that they could weigh her
credibilty.

Wishful thinking at best...another product of your overwrought
imagination.
>
>
> <WHAT actually happened in HER case? >
>
> "I have posted it about a dozen times".

NO. BULL***. Did she threaten someone? Who? What was said? Did she
plead guilty? Was she convicted? How did she wind up in a state
facility for the mentally impaired?

IN WHAT MANNER WERE HER LEGAL TROUBLES A RESULT OF HER LYME ADVOCACY?
Where's the connection?
>
>
> <AND you...ARE A LIAR. YOU tried to shake money out of Lyme patients
> for
> some fictitious charity>
>
> "Your ten millionth libel against me, recorded".

Sorry, hon...but no. You said that this "charity" was to come to the
aid of "families"...and it was very clear whose "family" you meant. In
addition, you repeatedly stated that her child custody issues were a
direct result of her "speaking out about Lyme disease"...a deliberate
LIE...of which both you and Kathleen were well aware. You solicited
funds from Lyme patients under false pretenses.

By the way...who are you? The basis for defammation is holding up one's
reputation to public scorn and ridicule.

You seem to write under an alias and have consistently refused to
verify your real name.

> <How about that infantile Romeo and Juliet piece?
> Wonderful.>
>
> That it offends you shows EXACTLY which side you are on, you filthy
> Steere camp pig.
>
It didn't "offend" me...it just amazed me that someone would take the
time to write somehing that remarkably juvenile and presumably think it
clever.

It offends intelligence, I suppose...

.

Loading