Re: pig driteman

Put Weisman back on.

K


derdrittemann2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> kathleen wrote:
>
>
> > Dritte obviously very nervous.
> >
>
> No, Kathleen...
>
> ...sick and tired of your lies and CRAP.
>
> Disgusted at you and your pathetic lies. How can you dare accuse
others
> of "FRAUD" and not telling the truth and hide behind all these lies?
>
> Understand something...in a child custody hearing the judge don't
give
> a damn about what Chuck P. Adams thinks about anything. It can't even
> come in...it is rank hearsay and completely irrelevant. (Did Chuck
know
> someone in your family or close to the case? Hell, I don't know...and
I
> don't know him or where he is...but would it be terribly surprising
if
> he had heard it from someone close to the case? Ever consider that
one
> "scientist")?
>
> The only relvant consideration in a custody hearing is YOUR fitness
as
> a parent to have custody.
>
> IF the attorney was making a claim that YOU said something about
> driving your kids into the lake...
>
> ...then the attorney was going to present WITNESSES to that
statement.
> People who heard you say it...otherwise, it is INADMISSABLE. (It
would
> be admissable as an exception to the hearsay rules...an exception
> called "state of mind").
>
> So, you see, not only does all of Lisa's ravings about what Chuck
said
> beforehand make no sense...if you just thought about it for even a
> second...you would realize that it couldn't possibly be true.
>
> But you already know that, don't you?
>
> Were these witnesses the kids, Kathleen?
>
> This is WHY we have courtrooms and go to the trouble of trials...we
> judge the credibility of WITNESSES...not NITWITS.
>
> Tell the truth.

.

Quantcast