Re: Dedrittemann, his friends and aliases



derdrittemann2003@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> kathleen wrote:
>
>
> > "Isn't it enough we caught you
> > posting under Dritte, when you thought
> > you were being Weis"?
>
>
> ROFLMAO.


From: derdrittemann2003 @ yahoo.com
Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
Subject: Re: The Lyme Enigma
Date: 30 Apr 2005 07:57:15 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 87
Message-ID: <1114873035.330074.276690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4270bc9d$0$776$3a628fcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<1114745557.264413.133010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<1114754065.551043.4740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<1114797832.816653.23060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<1114821668.949746.40260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<1114843161.419188.28690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.130.9.252
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1114873039 2273 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2005
14:57:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:57:19 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1114843161.419188.28690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=4.130.9.252;
posting-account=wH2haAwAAAA_JMmVYP2s0em74fd0hRO4


Filthy McNasty wrote:

> "I just wanted to make the following clear: I do not advocate
violence
> in any form, as I have posted numerous times on sci med and lymenet,
in
> addition to personal conversations; I do not know and have never met
> joe hamm who made precipitous comments about using a .22 on klempner;
> as stated in my post which der dritteman for some reason went bananas
> over, I have faith in our legal system's ability to function
correctly,
> ultimately, in catching criminals; I do not advocate vigilantism in
any
> form".

Derdrittemann went "bananas" over the postings because of their OBVIOUS
negative PR impact on the Lyme patient community.

DDM then asked both of you Guns and Ammo in the little boys room
children to remove the posts for that reason.

Another person...who not too surprisingly, jumped into this, achieved
his fifteen minutes of fame by "scheduling Steere for
termination"...and we've ALL had to live with that one for years now.

Hey, thanks for THIS one...and your shining contribution.
>
> "however, the stating that an individual wearing a bulletproof vest
> could not be harmed except by a head shot is a factual statement, not
a
> criminal suggestion. it is not a direct threat on the persons life;
it
> is not a conspiracy; it is not an incitement; it is simply an
> observation. an observation resulting from klempner's public
statements
> that he wears a vest. an observation, a speculation, nothing more.
the
> idea of dritteman that it was a suggestion for action is absurd,
> especially when the paragraphs preceding the statement warned hamm
> about the police being informed and opined against violent acts".

Well...the drittemann at no time, I don't believe, suggested that it
"was a call for action"...or even said that it was a problem legally.
Did he?

However, telling someone who has just threatened to shoot someone that
the intended target wears a bulletproof vest...DESPITE all the
self-serving disengenuous language about non-violence...was, at least,
interpreted by Joe Hamm as advice to shoot in the "ugly pus"(sic).
Like I said, you tell the laws what you meant...I am not going to
debate it with you. Damned stupid, though, I can tell you that.
>
> "I have contacted the FBI myself in this matter to ensure that the
> transcript of what was said is complete and not cut and pasted with
> removed posts doctored, as I removed the original post".

No s--t? Did you really? Ooops. I didn't. LMAO.

"I have 110%
> confidence that I have committed no crime".

I don't think I ever said you did. Sounds like your brother-in-law has
now had a chance to look at the exchange, though.

"I have never advocated
> violence or laid any plans or asked anyone to participate in a
violent
> act for any reason. even a snake like klempner has a family. But
what
> I can promise you is this: if dritteman failed to send a complete
> transcript,meaning, before I removed my post, he's going to be in
deep
> ***. I can guarantee that. He will be identified".

Are you threatening me with non-violence?
>
> "and drittemann...one other thing...I can imagine you spewing a lot
of
> things out, thinking it's good information, and then poof, it's going
> to blow up in your face. and then you're the idiot".

You are really, really over-reacting. I asked you to remove to remove
the post because I was afraid of what the media could do with it.

Change your underwear and shut up.




Google Home - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs, Press, & Help

©2005 Google

.

Quantcast