Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!

From: derdrittemann2003@xxxxxxxxx
Date: 3 Jun 2005 10:58:04 -0700

CaliforniaLyme wrote:
> So, now...it appears to me that Kathleen was NOT being overtly
> dishonest.
>
> UNQUOTE
>
> So are you going to apologize for questioning her honesty?

ARE YOU SERIOUS?

I am TRYING to be NICE here...be conciliatory.

She refused to answer direct questions concerning the matter...and NOW
says that the US Attorney was "incorrect".

You have to be joking.

.

References:
- Hey Kathleen*)!!!
  - From: CaliforniaLyme
- Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
  - From: derdrittemann2003
- Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
  - From: CaliforniaLyme
- Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
  - From: derdrittemann2003
- Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
  - From: CaliforniaLyme

Prev by Date: Re: CFIDS Chronicle cover article about Lyme disease
Next by Date: Re: CFIDS Chronicle cover article about Lyme disease
Previous by thread: Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
Next by thread: Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
... CaliforniaLyme wrote: ... > dishonest. ... > UNQUOTE ... > So are you going to apologize for questioning her honesty? ...
(sci.med.diseases.lyme)
Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
... > dishonest. ... > UNQUOTE ... > "So are you going to apologize for questioning her honesty"? ... DELIBERATELY trying to mislead people... ...
(sci.med.diseases.lyme)