Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
- From: derdrittemann2003@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 3 Jun 2005 11:59:47 -0700
CaliforniaLyme wrote:
> So, now...it appears to me that Kathleen was NOT being overtly
> dishonest.
>
> UNQUOTE
>
> "So are you going to apologize for questioning her honesty"?
And just so we're clear here...what I am saying is that after reading
her "case"...it appears to me that she understands so little of
this...what has to be done legally...that she PROBABLY isn't
DELIBERATELY trying to mislead people...
....and that is straining an interpretation somewhat. Problem is...she
IS misleading people...herself, first and foremost.
The point is...people are being misled all the same...either through
dishonesty, or just ignorance and incompetence.
Most people would seek professional guidance when suing Yale, let alone
all the other entites she's listed. You should think about what that
says about Kathleen.
She does NOT know what she is doing...I can tell you that. But for some
reason, she does have an obsession, it would seem, to be
center-stage...the "hero". And she won't let go...and you and others
are aiding this fixation.
If she is so damned honest...then I expect her to answer my question as
to WHY the US Attorney is "misinformed".
Let's see, shall we?
.
- References:
- Hey Kathleen*)!!!
- From: CaliforniaLyme
- Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
- From: derdrittemann2003
- Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
- From: CaliforniaLyme
- Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
- From: derdrittemann2003
- Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
- From: CaliforniaLyme
- Hey Kathleen*)!!!
- Prev by Date: Re: Conversation with the US Attorney--District of Connecticut
- Next by Date: Re: CFIDS Chronicle cover article about Lyme disease
- Previous by thread: Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
- Next by thread: Re: Hey Kathleen*)!!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
