Re: Big Pharma, Wrong OspA
- From: "GregGerber" <gregorygerber@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jun 2005 11:44:46 -0700
derdrittemann2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> My impression is that this is being done for the most part, for the
> simple reason that their lawyers insist on it as a matter of
> intellectual property PROTECTION...and therefore, not necessarily
> indicative of any intent to "profit".
> My impression is that most such patents probably do not represent any
> great commercial value, if indeed, any.
Actually in aggregate they represent potentially tremendous commercial
value and have been associated with hundreds of millions in revenue in
the business plans and grant proposals written by the scientists
themselves; many of these plans are on file, in the public domain, at
NIH. For this reason what you say above is not correct --RATHER the
point is that it is the same in EVERY disease. Lyme is not a special
case. Biomedicine is awash in conflict of interest, of that there is no
doubt.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Big Pharma, Wrong OspA
- From: derdrittemann2003
- Re: Big Pharma, Wrong OspA
- References:
- RICO activities before Dearborn--Kathleen rules
- From: Greatcod
- Re: RICO activities before Dearborn--Kathleen rules
- From: derdrittemann2003
- Re: RICO activities before Dearborn--Kathleen rules
- From: Greatcod
- Re: RICO activities before Dearborn--Kathleen rules
- From: Greatcod
- Big Pharma, Wrong OspA
- From: derdrittemann2003
- Re: Big Pharma, Wrong OspA
- From: GregGerber
- Re: Big Pharma, Wrong OspA
- From: derdrittemann2003
- RICO activities before Dearborn--Kathleen rules
- Prev by Date: Re: Does lyme make you Fat and Ugly?
- Next by Date: Re: OT - DerDurtyMEN murder 3000 American Citizens
- Previous by thread: Re: Big Pharma, Wrong OspA
- Next by thread: Re: Big Pharma, Wrong OspA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
