Re: it depends on what he means by "law"

Sheesh

A typical ignorant twit who hasn't a CLUE what constitutes slander or libel.

lisasawitch wrote: 

MicheleP wrote:

Proper complaints to agencies?  You call "spinlyme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
scilyme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" proper agencies?

You don't scare me the least bit. Go ahead. get me for slander (which
by the way Ms. Bionic Law, is defamatory assertation expressed in a
transitionary form of speech...




What? What is "transitionary form of speech" ?

Where do you come up with this?


and it has to be a lie, that changes
your impression of character.



No that is very poorly stated.


Based on what I've seen here on the
board, you are not held in high esteem - and it's probably due to your
abrasive and ignorant character flaws.



Look in the mirror honey. There's a reason you were chased away from
Lymenet and there's a reason you've fought with everyone on all sides
here. You might be a beauty pageant winner but as they said on Lymenet,
you probably didn't win miss congeniality.


How the heck would you know what I am saying??? LOL

Also, libel is much different. Libel means I am spreading lies about
you to defame you.



No. Libel means you're spreading defamatory information in writing no
matter what your intent. Intent is only an issue in cases invovling
public figures where the defamation needs to be shown to be made with
malice or reckless disregard for the truth. In most libel cases your
intent isn't at issue except if it is intentional there might be
punitive damages.


Which I'm not. Number one, you defame yourself
everytime - almost - you write.




I agree with that.


Number two, Nothing of what I've
stated is a lie.

So...sue away. I could use more publicity. LOL

ps. Maybe I'll shiver and hide behind Yale in court. 


Now that was funny.


--
"...in addition to being foreign territory the past is, as history, a hall of mirrors that reflect the needs of souls observing from the present"
Glen Cook
.

Relevant Pages

  • Basic Libel for Idiots
    ... Libel is the written word. ... In the UK, if someone thinks that what you wrote about them is either defamatory or damaging, the onus will be entirely on you to prove that your comments are true in court. ... And it's not just the person making the allegations who can fall foul of the libel laws. ... If your offending article about Mr Dyke was published in Magazine X, ...
    (soc.culture.greek)
  • Re: it depends on what he means by "law"
    ... > Proper complaints to agencies? ... > scilyme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" proper agencies? ... Libel means I am spreading lies about ... Intent is only an issue in cases invovling ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • Re: de Silva: Apology requested
    ... > unconditional apology for this libel was not forthcoming. ... > is for your isp to decide whether you have, or are capable of, defaming ... > offensive, abusive, menacing, threatening, harrassing or solicited". ... Nothing about defamatory, offensive, abusive, menacing, threatening, ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: Any contributions?
    ... interested people & maintaining that his business & personal life was ... the rules of my game are simple, libel me and I will sue. ... so you repeat your defamatory remarks. ... and that I am trying to ruin peoples lives out of pure malice. ...
    (uk.local.southwest)
  • Re: STINK-BEETLE ALAN HOPE STILL ON LIBEL RAMPAGE!
    ... Yes, Alan. ... For it to be truly libel, it has to be adjudged so. ... publication of false and defamatory ... Wales -- you would need to prove you had a reputation that could be ...
    (misc.writing)