Re: it depends on what he means by "law"



MicheleP wrote:
> Proper complaints to agencies? You call "spinlyme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> scilyme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" proper agencies?
>
> You don't scare me the least bit. Go ahead. get me for slander (which
> by the way Ms. Bionic Law, is defamatory assertation expressed in a
> transitionary form of speech...


What? What is "transitionary form of speech" ?

Where do you come up with this?

>and it has to be a lie, that changes
> your impression of character.

No that is very poorly stated.

>Based on what I've seen here on the
> board, you are not held in high esteem - and it's probably due to your
> abrasive and ignorant character flaws.

Look in the mirror honey. There's a reason you were chased away from
Lymenet and there's a reason you've fought with everyone on all sides
here. You might be a beauty pageant winner but as they said on Lymenet,
you probably didn't win miss congeniality.

> How the heck would you know what I am saying??? LOL
>
> Also, libel is much different. Libel means I am spreading lies about
> you to defame you.

No. Libel means you're spreading defamatory information in writing no
matter what your intent. Intent is only an issue in cases invovling
public figures where the defamation needs to be shown to be made with
malice or reckless disregard for the truth. In most libel cases your
intent isn't at issue except if it is intentional there might be
punitive damages.

>Which I'm not. Number one, you defame yourself
> everytime - almost - you write.


I agree with that.

> Number two, Nothing of what I've
> stated is a lie.
>
> So...sue away. I could use more publicity. LOL
>
> ps. Maybe I'll shiver and hide behind Yale in court.

Now that was funny.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: it depends on what he means by "law"
    ... Also, libel is much different. ... No. Libel means you're spreading defamatory information in writing no ... Intent is only an issue in cases invovling ... public figures where the defamation needs to be shown to be made with ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • Re: OT: Mark Speight dead
    ... "Libel per se involves statements so vicious that malice is assumed and does not require a proof of intent to get an award of general damages. ...
    (uk.games.video.xbox)
  • Re: OT: Mark Speight dead
    ... does not require a proof of intent to get an award of general damages. ... Libel against the reputation of a person who has died will allow surviving ...
    (uk.games.video.xbox)