KATHLEEN STOP OFF TOPIC POSTING AND TELL THE TRUTH ANSWER THE QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR CRIMES!

ANSWER THE QUESTIONS KATHLEEN


Let's see how you like it kathleen EVERY time you post, I will change
the title of the thread and I will post these questions until you
answer them one by one and answering them means NOT talking about
mcsweegan or former governor rowland and all your typical diversionary
crap anyway.


PLUS you are cross posting ONCE AGAIN TOTALLY OFF TOPIC and you're
selfish to do this to one newsgroups CRIMINAL to do it to multiple
newsgroups--yes here is your "crime": You are preventing people who
need help from getting help for your selfish personal reasons that you
are so completely egocentric along with delusional paranoid
schizophrenic with psychotic features that you just can't see past your



own twisted delusional psychotic personal agenda--which ought to be
about getting your kids back and solving your own enormous problems in
life instead of trying to solve anyone else's. By preventing people
from getting help you are responsible for the consequences. Surely
people are dying as a result so you are a murderer (trying out a little



kathleen "logic" here. So you are now being reported to the DOJ FBI and



CIA and WHO and UN and DCF and the federal and state courts and
homeland insanity department and all over the planet as a murderer.


How do you like them apples?


Now answer the questions. And stop the off topic cross posting. Answer
the questions TRUTHFULLY for a change. Focus on the question. If
there's a question yuo don't understand which is hard to believe given
your self declared genius IQ, let us know and we'll rephrase it.


Don't LIE as you do and don't try your diversionary tactics. Ignore
this and I will keep reposting it kathleen. Not only that but your
silence will be construed as admissions to all of the facts listed as
questions.


PS: This is NOT "taunting" You have put your credibility at issue. You
have repeatedly said that you NEVER lie. We deserve the answers to
these questions. Straight answers.


REPOST:


http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thre...



Nope we're talking about YOU. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS


And come back and tell us when Steere or McSweegan or anyone else is
actually charged with your "Lyme Crymes" instead of telling us what
you, in all your infinite wisdom, think will happen.


Now let's talk not about who WILL be convicted but WHO already has
been--YOU.


Here's the question list. One by one give us some answers. Your post is



just like the Bush White House trying to DIVERT attention from what
Karl Rove did to Joe Wilson--by attacking him AGAIN.


Nope answer the questions kathleen. Stop trying to change the subject.
I know you're delusional but try to focus. Here is a list of questions
for YOU. We've already heard your ramblings about 100,000 times. Now
dish some TRUTH for a change--I'm going to leave space between the
questions for your answers:


Was your case appealed and was your conviction overturned?


And what isn't true? Everything can be backed up with your own posts
kathleen. Not a big secret how people know since you posted it all
here.


Were you charged with and convicted of threatening and harassing
Jessica Gauvin?


Did you flee to Canada?


Did you tell everyone that your case was a custody case against DCF
when the truth was that it was a criminal case against you and your
kids had been taken away many months earlier and you didn't even appeal



that?


Did you threaten to bomb the stonington schools, joke or not?


Did you show up at your kid's safe house with a bag full of drugs
whether you meant to give them to your lawyer or not?


Come on specifically what isn't true?


You were charged tried and convicted in a court of law. Right or wrong,



admit or deny?


Now you say you've proven you're innocent.


In what court were your convictions overturned?


In fact, tell us what the charges were. Give some detail. What exactly
were you convicted of doing or threatening to do to Jessica Gauvin?


Tell us what your diagnosis was in the mental institution?


You admit or deny that your kids were taken away by child services in
CT?


Admit or deny you were charged with crimes?


Admit or deny you feld to canada?


Admit or deny you were convicted?


Admit or deny you were institutionalized in a mental ward locked wing?


Admit or deny that your convictions were never reversed, in fact you
never filed an appeal did you?


So who's lying about what?


Yeah sure, you say everyone lied about the charges. But that's not what



the court thought was it?


Did you register a website claiming on it you were working for Pfizer
at the time when you had "retired" years before?


Was Lymeraft which solicited funds for YOU, ever a proper legally
registered charity?


kathleen you're the liar here.


Do you really expect everyone to believe that the rest of the world is
crazy, not you?


And that the rest if the world has conspired to frame you? Because of
your lyme activism which you have even admitted amounts to more posting



on the internet than any real accomplishments?


Come on kathleen. What isn't true specifically issue by issue above.
Tell us specifically which items you say aren't true. We can go back
and find the posts where you admitted stuff and show what a liar YOU
are!




kathleen wrote:
> Opinion
>
> Rovegate-let's pull the thread!
>
> By Jerry Mazza
> Online Journal Contributing Writer
>
> Download a .pdf file for printing.
> Adobe Acrobat Reader required.
> Click here to download a free copy.
>
> July 23, 2005-Okay, so America's leading journalists, from Time
> Magazine, Newsweek, and The New York Times, to the most distinguished
> writers on the Internet, tell us Rove did it. Outed an undercover CIA
> operative, Valerie Plame, because her husband, former ambassador and
> Africa expert Joseph Wilson, the man picked by the CIA to investigate
> the Italian intelligence's original reports (passed on to England and
> America) had returned from his African mission and said the reports
> were "bogus." Thanks for the straight talk, Joe.
>
> But Joe, the man George HW Bush had called a hero for his service as
> charge d'affairs in Baghdad before the first Gulf War, the respected
> friend of past Republican and Democratic presidents, had said more:
> that the administration had "twisted" intelligence to "exaggerate" the
> Iraqi threat. In fact, after Bush proclaimed the disinformation in a
> State of the Union Address, the White House admitted the nuke claim
> should not have even been made. In fact, the original source papers
> were eventually deemed "forged" by the head of the International Atomic
> Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei.
>
> So Wilson was right, yes, absolutely unequivocally right, Karl and
> America. Yet we rushed into Iraq and blew up the country? We took our
> eyes off the so-called War on Terror in Afghanistan and opened up a
> second front for our already short numbers of troops, to leave them
> short in both conflicts, under-equipped, with no post-victory plan to
> stabilize Iraq. We ignored our major allies' admonitions, France,
> Germany, Japan, Russia, and the UN, and went ahead with our unilateral
> war, the same Richard Clarke had told us Bush wanted from day one of
> his administration, pre-9/11.
>
> What's more, the question remains, why hasn't President Bush fired Rove
> for outing Wilson's wife and ending her career as a CIA operative and
> endangering the lives of those who worked for her-and for smearing
> the name of her hero husband, Joe Wilson? Why? Bush said three times so
> far that whoever leaked the information in the White House would be
> fired.
>
> Could it be that if we pull the Rove thread we find that it connects to
> the thread of mastermind Cheney, originally designing and spreading the
> WMD fear and paranoia? The Cheney thread connects to the hem of
> Condolezza Rice, echoing that mushroom clouds of destruction would soon
> be appearing if we didn't go to war immediately. That connects to the
> thread of the well-tailored suits of Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Colin Powell
> & Company, the bobble-dolls nodding their heads to it all, yes, we had
> to fight immediately, even sooner, here are the graphs, charts, right
> now, go, give your lives, take more!
>
> But don't blame the CIA on this one. The CIA told them up front the
> intelligence was faulty, and got blamed afterward by Bush, who claimed
> it gave the administration false information. Damned if you do, damned
> if you don't.
>
> But if we do pull the thread long enough, we will unravel an organized
> conspiracy to take America to war, illegally, unconstitutionally. Keep
> pulling the thread and we see the emperor has no clothes, no defense.
> The commander in chief gave a nod to this all. Yes, like his Republican
> precursor, Richard Milhous Nixon, who was the hand, the force behind
> Watergate, the burglars, the Plumbers, and the refusals to testify to
> the Senate, to give up the tapes, the recorded plans to corrupt
> America's government. So too it is Bush, albeit with his ventriloquist
> Cheney, who is behind Rovegate, the thread to the grand plan to
> globalize the world through perpetual war for oil and the power it
> brings.
>
> Is it any wonder Nixon ducked impeachment and resigned from the
> presidency? The prospect of getting booted into a jail cell didn't look
> good to the paranoid, alcoholic Nixon. I wonder how it looks to George
> W. Bush, ex-boozer and cokehead, or to *** Cheney and their fellow
> conspirators. What's more, Rovegate is far worse than Watergate, far
> worse. Rovegate, the conspiracy to take America to war illegally, has
> caused the death of nearly 1,800 American fighting men and women,
> caused upwards of 12,000 casualties, and the deaths of more than
> 100,000 Iraqis. In fact next to Rovegate, Watergate is a mere stone
> dropped in a pond, a plop in the roiling cauldron of history. But the
> consequences of Rovegate can blow that cauldron apart.
>
> Yet, what is the response? The Republicans are all out front
> cheerleading for Rove as a whistle-blower. What or whose whistle is he
> blowing? Someone tell me. He outed Plame. Part A of the federal law
> says "a government official with access to classified information about
> covert personnel who intentionally exposes an operative, knowing that
> the US 'is taking affirmative measures to conceal' the operative's
> identity, can face up to 10 years in prison or a $50,000 fine or both."
>
> I'll spare you parts B and C because Rove fits Part A to a tee, as in
> thread. The question is will Prosecutor Fitzgerald have the courage to
> pull the thread? Remember what happened to his fellow Irishman, John
> O'Neill, the super-straight FBI investigator, who had been blocked at
> every turn tracking down leads on Osama bin Laden because he might
> discover connects from Afghanistan to CIA digs. O'Neill was stopped
> cold from investigating the Cole bombing. And put off other leads by
> Louis Freeh and Thomas Picard, two club members who made sure important
> reports from FBI agents vanished.
>
> O'Neill, who had resigned from the FBI and counter-terrorism efforts
> after 30 years of service, had ironically become head of security for
> World Trade Center, where he died on Sept. 11. 2001.
>
> And will the public demand that Fitzgerald pull the thread? Will
> America finally unravel this web of death and deception, the shame of
> the millennium, the same that goes back to 9/11 with even more shocking
> revelations. Does the rhetoric disturb my conservative friends or my
> liberal friends? Does the sight of those bodies, at WTC or abroad,
> disturb them? Does a world at war disturb anyone, a crumbling economy,
> a staggering debt, the looting of health, pension and welfare funds,
> Social Security, state budgets?
>
> Does anything haunt these weavers of Rovegate? Will someone help George
> pull the thread, and maybe seek a bailout deal, like Tricky ***. Will
> someone see what pulling the thread to Rovegate really is, an end to
> the end-times we've been living, a goodbye to the Antichrist at the
> helm, a return to a moral and normal life.
>
> Does any one miss that high ground? I do. Does Matthew Cooper,
> obviously frightened, and contradicting himself writing in "What I told
> the Grand Jury," in Time, 7/25/2005 . . .
>
> "So did Rove leak Plame's name to me or tell me she was a cover?
> No. Was it through my conversation with Rove that I learned for the
> first time that Wilson's wife worked at the CIA and may have been
> responsible for sending him? Yes. Did Rove say that she worked at the
> 'agency' on "WMD"? Yes. When he said things would be declassified soon,
> was that itself impermissible? I don't know. Is any of this a crime?
> Beats me. At this point, I'm as curious as anyone else to see what
> Patrick Fitzgerald has."
>
> Does his furtive e-mail to his boss tell you . . .
>
> "Spoke to Rove on double super secret background for about two mins
> before he want on vacation. . . . his big warning. . . . don't get too
> far out on Wilson. . . . says that the DCIA didn't authorize the trip
> and that Cheney didn't authorize the trip. it was, KR said, wilson's
> wife, who apparently works at the agency on wmd issues, who authorized
> the trip. not only the genesis of the trip is flawed ans[d] suspect but
> so is the Niger. . . . some of this is going to be dclassified in the
> coming days, KR said. don't get too far out in front, he warned. then
> he bolted. . . . will include in next file. . . . ."
>
> Right, Karl. You knew it was the deputy chief of the CIA's
> Counterproliferation Division, Valerie's boss, who authorized the trip.
> But the check is in the mail, Karl, $60 million I believe, for
> presidential consulting. They'll fix the rest in the mix. And, well,
> we'll try to keep the shackles comfortable as you frog-walk out the
> door to prison, the man who outed a CIA operative. Good luck.
>
> Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer living in New York with a low
> tolerance for government obscenity. Reach him at gvmaz@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not
> necessarily reflect those of Online Journal.
> Email editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Copyright © 1998-2005 Online Journal?. All rights reserved.
>
> You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice
> from copies of the content.

.