Re: About KATHLEEN



ANSWER THE QUESTIONS KATHLEEN


Let's see how you like it kathleen EVERY time you post, I will change
the title of the thread and I will post these questions until you
answer them one by one and answering them means NOT talking about
mcsweegan or former governor rowland and all your typical diversionary
crap anyway.


PLUS you are cross posting ONCE AGAIN TOTALLY OFF TOPIC and you're
selfish to do this to one newsgroups CRIMINAL to do it to multiple
newsgroups--yes here is your "crime": You are preventing people who
need help from getting help for your selfish personal reasons that you
are so completely egocentric along with delusional paranoid
schizophrenic with psychotic features that you just can't see past your



own twisted delusional psychotic personal agenda--which ought to be
about getting your kids back and solving your own enormous problems in
life instead of trying to solve anyone else's. By preventing people
from getting help you are responsible for the consequences. Surely
people are dying as a result so you are a murderer (trying out a little



kathleen "logic" here. So you are now being reported to the DOJ FBI and



CIA and WHO and UN and DCF and the federal and state courts and
homeland insanity department and all over the planet as a murderer.


How do you like them apples?


Now answer the questions. And stop the off topic cross posting. Answer
the questions TRUTHFULLY for a change. Focus on the question. If
there's a question yuo don't understand which is hard to believe given
your self declared genius IQ, let us know and we'll rephrase it.


Don't LIE as you do and don't try your diversionary tactics. Ignore
this and I will keep reposting it kathleen. Not only that but your
silence will be construed as admissions to all of the facts listed as
questions.


PS: This is NOT "taunting" You have put your credibility at issue. You
have repeatedly said that you NEVER lie. We deserve the answers to
these questions. Straight answers.


REPOST:


http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thre...



Nope we're talking about YOU. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS


And come back and tell us when Steere or McSweegan or anyone else is
actually charged with your "Lyme Crymes" instead of telling us what
you, in all your infinite wisdom, think will happen.


Now let's talk not about who WILL be convicted but WHO already has
been--YOU.


Here's the question list. One by one give us some answers. Your post is



just like the Bush White House trying to DIVERT attention from what
Karl Rove did to Joe Wilson--by attacking him AGAIN.


Nope answer the questions kathleen. Stop trying to change the subject.
I know you're delusional but try to focus. Here is a list of questions
for YOU. We've already heard your ramblings about 100,000 times. Now
dish some TRUTH for a change--I'm going to leave space between the
questions for your answers:


Was your case appealed and was your conviction overturned?


And what isn't true? Everything can be backed up with your own posts
kathleen. Not a big secret how people know since you posted it all
here.


Were you charged with and convicted of threatening and harassing
Jessica Gauvin?


Did you flee to Canada?


Did you tell everyone that your case was a custody case against DCF
when the truth was that it was a criminal case against you and your
kids had been taken away many months earlier and you didn't even appeal



that?


Did you threaten to bomb the stonington schools, joke or not?


Did you show up at your kid's safe house with a bag full of drugs
whether you meant to give them to your lawyer or not?


Come on specifically what isn't true?


You were charged tried and convicted in a court of law. Right or wrong,



admit or deny?


Now you say you've proven you're innocent.


In what court were your convictions overturned?


In fact, tell us what the charges were. Give some detail. What exactly
were you convicted of doing or threatening to do to Jessica Gauvin?


Tell us what your diagnosis was in the mental institution?


You admit or deny that your kids were taken away by child services in
CT?


Admit or deny you were charged with crimes?


Admit or deny you feld to canada?


Admit or deny you were convicted?


Admit or deny you were institutionalized in a mental ward locked wing?


Admit or deny that your convictions were never reversed, in fact you
never filed an appeal did you?


So who's lying about what?


Yeah sure, you say everyone lied about the charges. But that's not what



the court thought was it?


Did you register a website claiming on it you were working for Pfizer
at the time when you had "retired" years before?


Was Lymeraft which solicited funds for YOU, ever a proper legally
registered charity?


kathleen you're the liar here.


Do you really expect everyone to believe that the rest of the world is
crazy, not you?


And that the rest if the world has conspired to frame you? Because of
your lyme activism which you have even admitted amounts to more posting



on the internet than any real accomplishments?


Come on kathleen. What isn't true specifically issue by issue above.
Tell us specifically which items you say aren't true. We can go back
and find the posts where you admitted stuff and show what a liar YOU
are!




Nomen Nescio wrote:
> A long and colorful Usenet history, for example:
>
> 7/6/03 - someone who watched his posts in alt.fan.rosieodonnell wrote: "We can all ignore Chuck P. Adams posts as the work of a troll looking for attention. Chuck P. Adams has only had himself kicked off of AOL once in a while for bothering people on usenet."
>
> 12/31/03 - making friends with the folks in alt.fan.juliaroberts: "The only reason that Chuck P. Adams posts into the usenet news groups
> is that he thinks that he will meet fellow people like himself and
> Michael Jackson, that like little boys!
>
> Chuck P. Adams is a very mentally sick person."
>
> 12/28/03 - He inspired someone in alt.war.civil.usa to write, "WHY DONT YOU FIND A NEW HOME. YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE. YOU HAVE YET TO MAKE AN HONEST POST. GET OFF THIS NEWSGROUP YOU ELECTRONIC COCKROACH! YOU HAVE NO BUISNESS PLYING YOUR LIES AND TROLLS HERE. YOU ARE NOT INTELLECTUALLY HONEST. GET OUT NOW! STAY OUT! TAKE YOUR e-roach BUDDY WITH YOU."
>
> 1/15/04 - in alt.fan.julia-roberts, one of his "fans" wrote: "Chuck P Adams is a certified nut case that loves to troll the usenet
> groups looking for young boys!
>
> This can be proven by doing a search of his idiotic troll posts over
> the years.
>
> Chuck P Adams (AKA Charles P Adams) and Randy Douglas were posting all
> sorts of stuff, a couple of years ago, about adopting a baby boy to
> raise as their own. This was of course untill the police stopped them.
>
> Chuck P Adams, and Randy Douglas, used to love to post about how they
> thought that NAMBLA was a good organization to belong to.
>
> NAMBLA --> North American Man Boy Love Association.
>
> Chuck is one sick puppy!"
>
> 12/28/03 - One of "Chucks" posts in alt.war.civil.usa - once again, being the troll who is playing the role of the anti-troll. Hes done this so many times in so many places -- the topic is secondary to him - he just needs to find places in which he can annoy people endlessly. Heres what he was saying to the civil war buffs:
>
> "He is a troll who is out to disrupt your group. Please do not reply to this
> this troll. It will be a matter of time before this troll is kicked off his ISP
> again and moves on.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Charles P Adams
> troll killer."
>
> ..and his intended victim replied:
> "GET OFF THIS NEWSGROUP YOU IDIOT!"
>
> 4/15/03 - in alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees, one of his fans posted: "Yankee ng troll Chuck P Adams agrees he will never grow up and be part of an intelligent society."
>
> 8/29/03 - in alt.cellular.sprintpcs, Chuck managed to annoy Sprint employees by claiming that THEY were trolls for posting to this newsgroup.
>
> 1/9/04 - he alienated the membership of alt.cellular.verizon, inspiring the comment, "Please dont feed the off-topic spamming idiot (whoops, I meant "troll").
>
> Adams, get a life."
>
> 2/26/03 - Chuck in one of his endlessly pointless arguments with everyone in the alt.fan.barbra.streisand newsgroup, declares himself "newsgroup leader":
>
> "I am the right wings worse nightmare. I have had many of these bums kicked off
> there ISPs for posting vulagr rude remarks to people in newsgroups. In return
> they attack me with lies and stupid pictures like in this thread. Its just
> there way of showing they lost, as always.
>
> Chuck P Adams
> newsgroup leader"
>
> 2/15/2003 - Enraging newsgroup members in ny.politics, one member posted, "If people take a few moments to do a search on Chuck P Adams, they can
> see for themselves what kind of a low life piece of crud he is. Chuck
> Adams and his wife Randy Douglas wanted to adopt a baby boy a few
> years back and posted all sorts of junk about it all over usenet. Its
> pretty simple to search and find all of Chucks sick posts about how
> he likes little boys, just like Michael Jackson likes little boys.
> Chuck has also mentioned that he thinks that NAMBLA is a noble
> organization."
>
> 2/11/03 - annoying people in alt.culture.ny-upstate: "Charles has already been tossed one time from AOL. Now Charles is back trying to get tossed again!"
>
> Hes been actively annoying people on Usenet for years, in other groups as well such as: alt.sports.hockey.nhl.ny-rangers, where he inspired the comment, "Still denying your pedophilia? Isnt that what the P stands for?"
>
> alt.tv.northern-exp: where one member posted on 12/9/03: "Troll Alert -Chuck Adams....who apparently logs on to this newsgroup every few months just to say
> something really nasty. Into the killfile with you, Chucko!"
>
>
> This is only a tiny excerpt. Seems that "Chuck" has been invading newsgroups for years and driving people crazy for years at a time, and acting out the definition of "troll" for those who might not fully appreciate what a usenet troll really is.
>
> Try Google "Groups" - these are Usenet newsgroups - and search for "chuck p adams" and troll. Just this little combination already gets you more than 240 hits.

.


Quantcast