Why bury a testing method that is 94.4% correct?

From: "brent" <borgersbrent@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Jul 2005 07:02:16 -0700

Molecular characterization of the humoral response to the 41-kilodalton
flagellar antigen of Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease agent.

PMID: 1894359 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Is this a proven method? (has it been duplicated)

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why bury a testing method that is 94.4% correct?
  - From: Chuck

Prev by Date: Re: About Chuck
Next by Date: Nadie, Nadie, Nadie, from 2000
Previous by thread: siboney
Next by thread: Re: Why bury a testing method that is 94.4% correct?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread