Re: kathleen STOP YOUR LYING YOU LYING LIAR!@

You are awfully frightened of spending life
in prison.

Kathleen

lisasawitch wrote:
> KATHLEEN IT AIN'T FUNNY STOP THE LIES YOU LYING LIAR!
>
>
> Featured in Court & Police
>
>
> Kathleen Dickson
> Published on 5/8/2004
>
>
> Kathleen Dickson, 46, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Thursday
>
> with being a fugitive from justice.
>
>
> © The Day Publishing Co., 2004
>
>
> Featured in Court & Police
>
>
> Kathleen Dickson
>
>
> Published on 5/9/2004
>
>
> Kathleen Dickson, 45, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Friday
> with second-degree harassment and threatening.
>
>
> © The Day Publishing Co., 2004
>
>
> ANSWER THE QUESTIONS KATHLEEN
>
>
> Let's see how you like it kathleen EVERY time you post, I will change
> the title of the thread and I will post these questions until you
> answer them one by one and answering them means NOT talking about
> mcsweegan or former governor rowland and all your typical diversionary
> crap anyway.
>
>
> PLUS you are cross posting ONCE AGAIN TOTALLY OFF TOPIC and you're
> selfish to do this to one newsgroups CRIMINAL to do it to multiple
> newsgroups--yes here is your "crime": You are preventing people who
> need help from getting help for your selfish personal reasons that you
> are so completely egocentric along with delusional paranoid
> schizophrenic with psychotic features that you just can't see past your
>
> own twisted delusional psychotic personal agenda--which ought to be
> about getting your kids back and solving your own enormous problems in
> life instead of trying to solve anyone else's. By preventing people
> from getting help you are responsible for the consequences. Surely
> people are dying as a result so you are a murderer (trying out a little
>
> kathleen "logic" here. So you are now being reported to the DOJ FBI and
>
> CIA and WHO and UN and DCF and the federal and state courts and
> homeland insanity department and all over the planet as a murderer.
>
>
> How do you like them apples?
>
>
> Now answer the questions. And stop the off topic cross posting. Answer
> the questions TRUTHFULLY for a change. Focus on the question. If
> there's a question yOU don't understand which is hard to believe given
> your self declared genius IQ, let us know and we'll rephrase it.
>
>
> Don't LIE as you do and don't try your diversionary tactics. Ignore
> this and I will keep reposting it kathleen. Not only that but your
> silence will be construed as admissions to all OF the facts listed as
> questions.
>
>
> PS: This is NOT "taunting" You have put your credibility at issue. You
> have repeatedly said that you NEVER lie. We deserve the answers to
> these questions. Straight answers.
>
>
> REPOST:
>
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thre...
>
>
>
> Nope we're talking about YOU. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
>
>
> And come back and tell us when Steere or McSweegan or anyone else is
> actually charged with your "Lyme Crymes" instead of telling us what
> you, in all your infinite wisdom, think will happen.
>
>
> Now let's talk not about who WILL be convicted but WHO already has
> been--YOU.
>
>
> Here's the question list. One by one give us some answers. Your post is
>
> just like the Bush White House trying to DIVERT attention from what
> Karl Rove did to Joe Wilson--by attacking him AGAIN.
>
>
> Nope answer the questions kathleen. Stop trying to change the subject.
>
>
> I know you're delusional but try to focus. Here is a list of questions
> for YOU. We've already heard your ramblings about 100,000 times. Now
> dish some TRUTH for a change--I'm going to leave space between the
> questions for your answers:
>
>
> Was your case appealed and was your conviction overturned?
>
>
> And what isn't true? Everything can be backed up with your own posts
> kathleen. Not a big secret how people know since you posted it all
> here.
>
>
> Were you charged with and convicted of threatening and harassing
> Jessica Gauvin?
>
>
> Did you flee to Canada?
>
>
> Did you tell everyone that your case was a custody case against DCF
> when the truth was that it was a criminal case against you and your
> kids had been taken away many months earlier and you didn't even appeal
>
> that?
>
>
> Did you threaten to bomb the stonington schools, joke or not?
>
>
> Did you show up at your kid's safe house with a bag full of drugs
> whether you meant to give them to your lawyer or not?
>
>
> Come on specifically what isn't true?
>
>
> You were charged tried and convicted in a court of law. Right or wrong,
>
> admit or deny?
>
>
> Now you say you've proven you're innocent.
>
>
> In what court were your convictions overturned?
>
>
> In fact, tell us what the charges were. Give some detail. What exactly
> were you convicted of doing or threatening to do to Jessica Gauvin?
>
>
> Tell us what your diagnosis was in the mental institution?
>
>
> You admit or deny that your kids were taken away by child services in
> CT?
>
>
> Admit or deny you were charged with crimes?
>
>
> Admit or deny you feld to canada?
>
>
> Admit or deny you were convicted?
>
>
> Admit or deny you were institutionalized in a mental ward locked wing?
>
>
> Admit or deny that your convictions were never reversed, in fact you
> never filed an appeal did you?
>
>
> So who's lying about what?
>
>
> Yeah sure, you say everyone lied about the charges. But that's not what
>
> the court thought was it?
>
>
> Did you register a website claiming on it you were working for Pfizer
> at the time when you had "retired" years before?
>
>
> Was Lymeraft which solicited funds for YOU, ever a proper legally
> registered charity?
>
>
> kathleen you're the liar here.
>
>
> Do you really expect everyone to believe that the rest of the world is
> crazy, not you?
>
>
> And that the rest if the world has conspired to frame you? Because of
> your lyme activism which you have even admitted amounts to more posting
>
> on the internet than any real accomplishments?
>
>
> Come on kathleen. What isn't true specifically issue by issue above.
>
>
> Tell us specifically which items you say aren't true. We can go back
> and find the posts where you admitted stuff and show what a liar YOU
> are!
>
>
>
>
> Chuck wrote:
> > Your NewsGroup Leader hears your
> > question, and must repeat the
> > answer. If you are not a methods
> > development chemist, and are not
> > fluent in FDA regulatory affairs, I
> > personally do not have the time
> > to give you a formal 4 year education
> > in chemistry, nor years worth
> > of insider training in the US
> > pharmaceutical industry.
> >
> > Your Leader sincerely hopes you
> > can find the time to reread this
> > 40,000 more times, before
> > asking me again, the same
> > questions.
> >
> > Have a nice day,
> >
> > NGL
> >
> > derdrittemann2003@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Chuck wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > "Yale has a patent for it:
> > > > 5,618,533"
> > >
> > >
> > > SO WHAT?
> > >
> > > That doesn't mean squat. We've been over and over this.
> > > >
> > > And...you didn't answer Brent's question...has it been replicated...has
> > > it been proven effective in independent tests?
> > >
> > > Where does this 94% figure come from?
> > >
> > > Who said it was "buried"?
> > >
> > > How about it "Chuck"? Can you tell us?

.